These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28640836)

  • 1. Craniofacial similarity analysis through sparse principal component analysis.
    Zhao J; Duan F; Pan Z; Wu Z; Li J; Deng Q; Li X; Zhou M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179671. PubMed ID: 28640836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Craniofacial reconstruction evaluation by geodesic network.
    Zhao J; Liu C; Wu Z; Duan F; Wang K; Jia T; Liu Q
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():943647. PubMed ID: 25214890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian estimation of optimal craniofacial reconstructions.
    Claes P; Vandermeulen D; De Greef S; Willems G; Clement JG; Suetens P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):146-52. PubMed ID: 20359836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Craniofacial Reconstruction Method Based on Region Fusion Strategy.
    Wen Y; Mingquan Z; Pengyue L; Guohua G; Xiaoning L; Kang L
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():8835179. PubMed ID: 33490260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structured Sparse Principal Components Analysis With the TV-Elastic Net Penalty.
    de Pierrefeu A; Lofstedt T; Hadj-Selem F; Dubois M; Jardri R; Fovet T; Ciuciu P; Frouin V; Duchesnay E
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Feb; 37(2):396-407. PubMed ID: 28880163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer vision and soft computing for automatic skull-face overlay in craniofacial superimposition.
    Campomanes-Álvarez BR; Ibáñez O; Navarro F; Alemán I; Botella M; Damas S; Cordón O
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Dec; 245():77-86. PubMed ID: 25447179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A regional method for craniofacial reconstruction based on coordinate adjustments and a new fusion strategy.
    Deng Q; Zhou M; Wu Z; Shui W; Ji Y; Wang X; Liu CY; Huang Y; Jiang H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Feb; 259():19-31. PubMed ID: 26773218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel skull registration based on global and local deformations for craniofacial reconstruction.
    Deng Q; Zhou M; Shui W; Wu Z; Ji Y; Bai R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):95-102. PubMed ID: 21185136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A PCA-Based method for determining craniofacial relationship and sexual dimorphism of facial shapes.
    Shui W; Zhou M; Maddock S; He T; Wang X; Deng Q
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Nov; 90():33-49. PubMed ID: 28918063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the accuracy of three-dimensional manual craniofacial reconstruction: a series of 25 controlled cases.
    Quatrehomme G; Balaguer T; Staccini P; Alunni-Perret V
    Int J Legal Med; 2007 Nov; 121(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 17899154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Craniofacial reconstruction as a prediction problem using a Latent Root Regression model.
    Berar M; Tilotta FM; Glaunès JA; Rozenholc Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jul; 210(1-3):228-36. PubMed ID: 21482053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multilinear sparse principal component analysis.
    Lai Z; Xu Y; Chen Q; Yang J; Zhang D
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1942-50. PubMed ID: 25291746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ground truth data generation for skull-face overlay.
    Ibáñez O; Cavalli F; Campomanes-Álvarez BR; Campomanes-Álvarez C; Valsecchi A; Huete MI
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 May; 129(3):569-81. PubMed ID: 25267257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A spatially-dense regression study of facial form and tissue depth: towards an interactive tool for craniofacial reconstruction.
    Shrimpton S; Daniels K; de Greef S; Tilotta F; Willems G; Vandermeulen D; Suetens P; Claes P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jan; 234():103-10. PubMed ID: 24378309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of a Novel Semi-Automatic Technique for Determining the Bilateral Symmetry Plane of the Facial Skeleton of Normal Adult Males.
    Roumeliotis G; Willing R; Neuert M; Ahluwalia R; Jenkyn T; Yazdani A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1997-2001. PubMed ID: 26355983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: methodology and validation.
    Claes P; Vandermeulen D; De Greef S; Willems G; Suetens P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 May; 159 Suppl 1():S147-58. PubMed ID: 16540276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An unusual case of cranial image recognition.
    Ghosh AK; Sinha P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Mar; 148(2-3):93-100. PubMed ID: 15639602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Past, present, and future of craniofacial superimposition: Literature and international surveys.
    Huete MI; Ibáñez O; Wilkinson C; Kahana T
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Jul; 17(4):267-78. PubMed ID: 25725530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Craniofacial applications of three-dimensional laser surface scanning.
    Da Silveira AC; Daw JL; Kusnoto B; Evans C; Cohen M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jul; 14(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 12867855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new OH5 reconstruction with an assessment of its uncertainty.
    Benazzi S; Bookstein FL; Strait DS; Weber GW
    J Hum Evol; 2011 Jul; 61(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 21463886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.