BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28640923)

  • 1. How much detail is needed in modeling a transcranial magnetic stimulation figure-8 coil: Measurements and brain simulations.
    Petrov PI; Mandija S; Sommer IEC; van den Berg CAT; Neggers SFW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178952. PubMed ID: 28640923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
    Opitz A; Legon W; Rowlands A; Bickel WK; Paulus W; Tyler WJ
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():253-264. PubMed ID: 23644000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR-based measurements and simulations of the magnetic field created by a realistic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil and stimulator.
    Mandija S; Petrov PI; Neggers SF; Luijten PR; van den Berg CA
    NMR Biomed; 2016 Nov; 29(11):1590-1600. PubMed ID: 27669678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditions for numerically accurate TMS electric field simulation.
    Gomez LJ; Dannhauer M; Koponen LM; Peterchev AV
    Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 31604625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coil optimisation for transcranial magnetic stimulation in realistic head geometry.
    Koponen LM; Nieminen JO; Mutanen TP; Stenroos M; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):795-805. PubMed ID: 28461068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eccentric figure-eight coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Sekino M; Ohsaki H; Takiyama Y; Yamamoto K; Matsuzaki T; Yasumuro Y; Nishikawa A; Maruo T; Hosomi K; Saitoh Y
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2015 Jan; 36(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 25399864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A semi-automated pipeline for finite element modeling of electric field induced in nonhuman primates by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Goswami N; Shen M; Gomez LJ; Dannhauer M; Sommer MA; Peterchev AV
    J Neurosci Methods; 2024 Aug; 408():110176. PubMed ID: 38795980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design and Evaluation of a Rodent-Specific Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil: An In Silico and In Vivo Validation Study.
    Boonzaier J; Petrov PI; Otte WM; Smirnov N; Neggers SFW; Dijkhuizen RM
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Apr; 23(3):324-334. PubMed ID: 31353780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational and experimental analysis of TMS-induced electric field vectors critical to neuronal activation.
    Krieg TD; Salinas FS; Narayana S; Fox PT; Mogul DJ
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046014. PubMed ID: 26052136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.
    Gomez LJ; Goetz SM; Peterchev AV
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):046033. PubMed ID: 29855433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of head and coil modeling for the calculation of induced electric field during transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Tachas NJ; Samaras T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jul; 93(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 23872490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obtaining accurate and calibrated coil models for transcranial magnetic stimulation using magnetic field measurements.
    Mancino AV; Milano FE; Bertuzzi FM; Yampolsky CG; Ritacco LE; Risk MR
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Jul; 58(7):1499-1514. PubMed ID: 32385790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.
    Deng ZD; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jan; 6(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 22483681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the different winding methods of coil on electromagnetic field during transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Yang S; Xu G; Wang L; Zhang X
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4270-3. PubMed ID: 19163656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Where does TMS Stimulate the Motor Cortex? Combining Electrophysiological Measurements and Realistic Field Estimates to Reveal the Affected Cortex Position.
    Bungert A; Antunes A; Espenhahn S; Thielscher A
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Nov; 27(11):5083-5094. PubMed ID: 27664963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with magnetic cores.
    Makaroff SN; Nguyen H; Meng Q; Lu H; Nummenmaa AR; Deng ZD
    J Neural Eng; 2023 Jan; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36548994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas.
    Janssen AM; Oostendorp TF; Stegeman DF
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 May; 12():47. PubMed ID: 25981522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Database of 25 validated coil models for electric field simulations for TMS.
    Drakaki M; Mathiesen C; Siebner HR; Madsen K; Thielscher A
    Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 35490970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Lu M; Ueno S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178422. PubMed ID: 28586349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional distribution of the electric field induced in the brain by transcranial magnetic stimulation using figure-8 and deep H-coils.
    Roth Y; Amir A; Levkovitz Y; Zangen A
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 24(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17277575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.