These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28641248)

  • 1. Method for Simulating Dose Reduction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Borges LR; Guerrero I; Bakic PR; Foi A; Maidment ADA; Vieira MAC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Nov; 36(11):2331-2342. PubMed ID: 28641248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Method for simulating dose reduction in digital mammography using the Anscombe transformation.
    Borges LR; Oliveira HCR; Nunes PF; Bakic PR; Maidment ADA; Vieira MAC
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2704-2714. PubMed ID: 27277017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation of dose reduction in tomosynthesis.
    Svalkvist A; Båth M
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):258-69. PubMed ID: 20175489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of CT dose-reduction simulation.
    Massoumzadeh P; Don S; Hildebolt CF; Bae KT; Whiting BR
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):174-89. PubMed ID: 19235386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
    Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi C; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32. PubMed ID: 17278508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examinations for creating an image of unacquired dose from the images of two types of dose in digital radiography.
    Yuhara T; Numano T
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2021; 29(4):597-615. PubMed ID: 33935128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative imaging in breast tomosynthesis and CT: comparison of detection and estimation task performance.
    Richard S; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2627-37. PubMed ID: 20632574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality in digital chest radiography.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-25. PubMed ID: 18259814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of time-efficient reconstruction methods in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):331-6. PubMed ID: 25855075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Realistic simulation of reduced-dose CT with noise modeling and sinogram synthesis using DICOM CT images.
    Won Kim C; Kim JH
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011901. PubMed ID: 24387509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
    Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model.
    Hu YH; Scaduto DA; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 28044312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and validation of realistic breast models for use in multiple alternative forced choice virtual clinical trials.
    Elangovan P; Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Young KC; Cooke V; Wilkinson L; Given-Wilson RM; Wallis MG; Wells K
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 62(7):2778-2794. PubMed ID: 28291738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the glandular composition on digital breast tomosynthesis image quality and dose optimisation.
    Marques T; Ribeiro A; Di Maria S; Belchior A; Cardoso J; Matela N; Oliveira N; Janeiro L; Almeida P; Vaz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):337-41. PubMed ID: 25836692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.