These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28642569)

  • 21. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations.
    Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-year clinical evaluation of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam in endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
    Shafiei F; Memarpour M; Doozandeh M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 21179997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Grey discoloration for the diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Rudolphy MP; van Loveren C; van Amerongen JP
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 8860028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
    Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal integrity of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Tarim B; Suzuki S; Suzuki S; Cox CF
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 9522690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marginal behaviour of self-etch adhesive/composite and combined amalgam-composite restorations.
    Kournetas N; Kakaboura A; Giftopoulos D; Chakmachi M; Rahiotis C; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Jun; 18(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 20698421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Marginal Fracture Between Conventional and Bonded Amalgam Restorations in Posterior Permanent Molar Teeth.
    Iqbal H; Rana SAA; Manzoor A; Nazir A; Akhtar M; Ghaffar H; Kashif M
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e44295. PubMed ID: 37779731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity of radiographs for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Rudolphy MP; Gorter Y; van Loveren C; van Amerongen JP
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical success of compomer and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Follow up in 36 months.
    Daou MH; Attin T; Göhring TN
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(11):1082-8. PubMed ID: 20020589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation.
    Marks LA; Weerheijm KL; van Amerongen WE; Groen HJ; Martens LC
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 10460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond.
    Ianzano JA; Mastrodomenico J; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam.
    Sharif MO; Merry A; Catleugh M; Tickle M; Brunton P; Dunne SM; Aggarwal VR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Feb; (2):CD005970. PubMed ID: 20166077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss.
    Krejci I; Lieber CM; Lutz F
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jan; 11(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 7498606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.