These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28642569)

  • 41. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.
    Duggal MS; Toumba KJ; Sharma NK
    Br Dent J; 2002 Sep; 193(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 12368893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Study regarding coronal fracture probability in posterior amalgam restorations].
    Andrian S; Iovan G; Oncea C; Teodorovici P; Hasna M
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2006; 110(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 17571568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with the bonded amalgam technique.
    Dias de Souza GM; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 11551017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 16924981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The durability of amalgam restorations in premolars and molars].
    Meeuwissen R; Eschen S; van Elteren P; Mulder J
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1984 Nov; 91(11):488-92. PubMed ID: 6597357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants.
    Martin J; Fernandez E; Estay J; Gordan VV; Mjor IA; Moncada G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22788726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial.
    Moncada G; Fernández E; Martín J; Arancibia C; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
    Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Resin composites in the post-amalgam age.
    Lutz F; Krejci I
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Dec; 20(12):1138-44, 1146, 1148. PubMed ID: 10850266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Survival analysis of amalgam restorations in long-term recall patients.
    Bjertness E; Sønju T
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Apr; 48(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 2343740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of Class II amalgam fillings on attachment loss.
    Keszthelyi G; Szabo I
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Feb; 11(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 6583214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influences on the bulk fracture incidence of amalgam restorations: a 7-year controlled clinical trial.
    Lemmens PL; Peters MC; van 't Hof MA; Letzel H
    Dent Mater; 1987 Apr; 3(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 3326764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.