These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28642894)

  • 1. The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations.
    Garoushi SK; Hatem M; Lassila LVJ; Vallittu PK
    Acta Biomater Odontol Scand; 2015 Jan; 1(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 28642894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short fiber reinforced composite: a new alternative for direct onlay restorations.
    Garoushi S; Mangoush E; Vallittu M; Lassila L
    Open Dent J; 2013; 7():181-5. PubMed ID: 24511331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
    Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture Resistance and Microleakage around Direct Restorations in High C-Factor Cavities.
    Battancs E; Sáry T; Molnár J; Braunitzer G; Skolnikovics M; Schindler Á; Szabó P B; Garoushi S; Fráter M
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Aug; 14(17):. PubMed ID: 36080538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture behavior of Bi-structure fiber-reinforced composite restorations.
    Lassila L; Säilynoja E; Prinssi R; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jan; 101():103444. PubMed ID: 31561057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative evaluation of marginal microleakage of three different resins in Class V composite restorations].
    Zhu Z; Zhu YQ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2017 Jun; 26(3):241-245. PubMed ID: 29098237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of short-fiber composite base on fracture behavior of direct and indirect restorations.
    Garoushi S; Sungur S; Boz Y; Ozkan P; Vallittu PK; Uctasli S; Lassila L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jul; 25(7):4543-4552. PubMed ID: 33417063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bilayered composite restoration: the effect of layer thickness on fracture behavior.
    Lassila L; Säilynoja E; Prinssi R; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S
    Biomater Investig Dent; 2020; 7(1):80-85. PubMed ID: 33015638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations.
    Guney T; Yazici AR
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):123-133. PubMed ID: 31693438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing marginal microleakage of three Bulk Fill composites in Class II cavities using confocal microscope: An in vitro study.
    Swapna MU; Koshy S; Kumar A; Nanjappa N; Benjamin S; Nainan MT
    J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(5):409-13. PubMed ID: 26430307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro Evaluation and Comparison of Microleakage of Two Restorative Composite Resins in Class II Situations using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.
    Nanda BD; Sharma P; Moudgil M; Sharma V; Gupta AK; Gupta D
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1100-1104. PubMed ID: 30287711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fiber-reinforced composite substructure: load-bearing capacity of an onlay restoration.
    Garoushi SK; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Oct; 64(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 16945893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of interface surface design on the fracture behavior of bilayered composites.
    Omran TA; Garoushi S; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2019 Jun; 127(3):276-284. PubMed ID: 31002749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of fiber inserts on gingival margin microleakage of Class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
    Shafiei F; Doozandeh M; Karimi V
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(3):58-63. PubMed ID: 29714702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
    Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.