These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

859 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28642995)

  • 1. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography.
    van Rosendael AR; Koning G; Dimitriu-Leen AC; Smit JM; Montero-Cabezas JM; van der Kley F; Jukema JW; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Scholte AJHA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 28642995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study.
    Tu S; Westra J; Yang J; von Birgelen C; Ferrara A; Pellicano M; Nef H; Tebaldi M; Murasato Y; Lansky A; Barbato E; van der Heijden LC; Reiber JHC; Holm NR; Wijns W;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):2024-2035. PubMed ID: 27712739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational quantitative flow ratio to assess functional severity of coronary artery stenosis.
    Ties D; van Dijk R; Pundziute G; Lipsic E; Vonck TE; van den Heuvel AFM; Vliegenthart R; Oudkerk M; van der Harst P
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 271():36-41. PubMed ID: 30131233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic coronary blood flow computation: validation in quantitative flow ratio from coronary angiography.
    Zhang Y; Zhang S; Westra J; Ding D; Zhao Q; Yang J; Sun Z; Huang J; Pu J; Xu B; Tu S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):587-595. PubMed ID: 30535657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessing Myocardial Ischemia in Prior Myocardial Infarction.
    Emori H; Kubo T; Kameyama T; Ino Y; Matsuo Y; Kitabata H; Terada K; Katayama Y; Aoki H; Taruya A; Shimamura K; Ota S; Tanaka A; Hozumi T; Akasaka T
    Circ J; 2018 Feb; 82(3):807-814. PubMed ID: 29343675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Liu L; Yang W; Nagahara Y; Li Y; Lamooki SR; Muramatsu T; Kitslaar P; Sarai M; Ozaki Y; Barlis P; Yan F; Reiber JH; Tu S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 26507326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study.
    Kołtowski Ł; Zaleska M; Maksym J; Tomaniak M; Soliński M; Puchta D; Holm NR; Opolski G; Kochman J
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 107(9):858-867. PubMed ID: 30128817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.
    Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve and resting full-cycle ratio in intermediate coronary lesions.
    Wienemann H; Ameskamp C; Mejía-Rentería H; Mauri V; Hohmann C; Baldus S; Adam M; Escaned J; Halbach M
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 362():59-67. PubMed ID: 35662563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II).
    Westra J; Tu S; Winther S; Nissen L; Vestergaard MB; Andersen BK; Holck EN; Fox Maule C; Johansen JK; Andreasen LN; Simonsen JK; Zhang Y; Kristensen SD; Maeng M; Kaltoft A; Terkelsen CJ; Krusell LR; Jakobsen L; Reiber JHC; Lassen JF; Bøttcher M; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 11(3):e007107. PubMed ID: 29555835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative Flow Ratio Identifies Nonculprit Coronary Lesions Requiring Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease.
    Spitaleri G; Tebaldi M; Biscaglia S; Westra J; Brugaletta S; Erriquez A; Passarini G; Brieda A; Leone AM; Picchi A; Ielasi A; Girolamo DD; Trani C; Ferrari R; Reiber JHC; Valgimigli M; Sabatè M; Campo G
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 11(2):e006023. PubMed ID: 29449325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis.
    Tanigaki T; Emori H; Kawase Y; Kubo T; Omori H; Shiono Y; Sobue Y; Shimamura K; Hirata T; Matsuo Y; Ota H; Kitabata H; Okubo M; Ino Y; Matsuo H; Akasaka T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2050-2059. PubMed ID: 31648766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study.
    Westra J; Andersen BK; Campo G; Matsuo H; Koltowski L; Eftekhari A; Liu T; Di Serafino L; Di Girolamo D; Escaned J; Nef H; Naber C; Barbierato M; Tu S; Neghabat O; Madsen M; Tebaldi M; Tanigaki T; Kochman J; Somi S; Esposito G; Mercone G; Mejia-Renteria H; Ronco F; Bøtker HE; Wijns W; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jul; 7(14):. PubMed ID: 29980523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) estimated retrospectively by conventional radiation saving X-ray angiography.
    Jin C; Ramasamy A; Safi H; Kilic Y; Tufaro V; Bajaj R; Fu G; Mathur A; Bourantas CV; Baumbach A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 May; 37(5):1491-1501. PubMed ID: 33454897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation Study of Image-Based Fractional Flow Reserve During Coronary Angiography.
    Pellicano M; Lavi I; De Bruyne B; Vaknin-Assa H; Assali A; Valtzer O; Lotringer Y; Weisz G; Almagor Y; Xaplanteris P; Kirtane AJ; Codner P; Leon MB; Kornowski R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 28916602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicability of quantitative flow ratio for rapid evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis: comparison with instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice.
    Watarai M; Otsuka M; Yazaki K; Inagaki Y; Kahata M; Kumagai A; Inoue K; Koganei H; Enta K; Ishii Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1963-1969. PubMed ID: 31243612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the ratio of coronary arterial lumen volume to left ventricle myocardial mass derived from coronary CT angiography on fractional flow reserve.
    Taylor CA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Achenbach S; Berman DS; Jensen JM; Dey D; Bøtker HE; Kim HJ; Khem S; Wilk A; Zarins CK; Bezerra H; Lesser J; Ko B; Narula J; Ahmadi A; Øvrehus KA; St Goar F; De Bruyne B; Nørgaard BL
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):429-436. PubMed ID: 28789941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: An inter-core laboratory variability study.
    Chang Y; Chen L; Westra J; Sun Z; Guan C; Zhang Y; Ding D; Xu B; Tu S
    Cardiol J; 2020; 27(3):230-237. PubMed ID: 30234896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery.
    Kwon W; Choi KH; Lee SH; Hong D; Shin D; Kim HK; Park KH; Choo EH; Kim CJ; Kim MC; Hong YJ; Ahn SG; Doh JH; Lee SY; Park SD; Lee HJ; Kang MG; Koh JS; Cho YK; Nam CW; Joh HS; Kyu Park T; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi SH; Jeong MH; Gwon HC; Hahn JY; Lee JM;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 May; 17(5):e013844. PubMed ID: 38771911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis.
    Xu B; Tu S; Qiao S; Qu X; Chen Y; Yang J; Guo L; Sun Z; Li Z; Tian F; Fang W; Chen J; Li W; Guan C; Holm NR; Wijns W; Hu S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(25):3077-3087. PubMed ID: 29101020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.