1306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28643075)
1. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transthoracic approach is associated with increased incidence of atrial fibrillation after esophageal resection.
Lohani KR; Nandipati KC; Rollins SE; Fetten K; Lee TH; Pallati PK; Yamamoto SR; Mittal SK
Surg Endosc; 2015 Jul; 29(7):2039-45. PubMed ID: 25361647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ;
Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Utilizing a Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis is Safe in the Western Patient Population.
Ben-David K; Tuttle R; Kukar M; Rossidis G; Hochwald SN
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):3056-62. PubMed ID: 27112585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Tapias LF; Morse CR
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 21967644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Peng X; Chen Y; Nassor Juma A; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Jiao Y; Zhang W; Zhuang W
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 May; 42(5):546-552. PubMed ID: 28626101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term weight development after esophagectomy for cancer-comparison between open Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive surgical approaches.
Ericson J; Lundell L; Klevebro F; Kamiya S; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Apr; 32(4):. PubMed ID: 30351390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Abdominothoracic esophageal resection according to Ivor Lewis with intrathoracic anastomosis : standardized totally minimally invasive technique].
Runkel N; Walz M; Ketelhut M
Chirurg; 2015 May; 86(5):468-75. PubMed ID: 24994588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.
Palazzo F; Rosato EL; Chaudhary A; Evans NR; Sendecki JA; Keith S; Chojnacki KA; Yeo CJ; Berger AC
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):672-9. PubMed ID: 25667145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
