These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28643093)

  • 41. Assessing the use of digital radiography and a real-time interactive pulmonary nodule analysis system for large population lung cancer screening.
    Xu Y; Ma D; He W
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e451-6. PubMed ID: 21621935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Expanding the role of radiographers in reporting suspected lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree model.
    Bajre MK; Pennington M; Woznitza N; Beardmore C; Radhakrishnan M; Harris R; McCrone P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Nov; 23(4):273-278. PubMed ID: 28965888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Digital tomosynthesis for evaluating metastatic lung nodules: nodule visibility, learning curves, and reading times.
    Lee KH; Goo JM; Lee SM; Park CM; Bahn YE; Kim H; Song YS; Hwang EJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):430-9. PubMed ID: 25741205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population screening trial: A descriptive study.
    Bernardi D; Li T; Pellegrini M; Macaskill P; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Houssami N
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():26-31. PubMed ID: 30150047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Temporal subtraction method for lung nodule detection on successive thoracic CT soft-copy images.
    Aoki T; Murakami S; Kim H; Fujii M; Takahashi H; Oki H; Hayashida Y; Katsuragawa S; Shiraishi J; Korogi Y
    Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):255-61. PubMed ID: 24475812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Performance and educational training of radiographers in lung nodule or mass detection: Retrospective comparison with different deep learning algorithms.
    Teng PH; Liang CH; Lin Y; Alberich-Bayarri A; González RL; Li PW; Weng YH; Chen YT; Lin CH; Chou KJ; Chen YS; Wu FZ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jun; 100(23):e26270. PubMed ID: 34115023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Lung nodule CAD software as a second reader: a multicenter study.
    White CS; Pugatch R; Koonce T; Rust SW; Dharaiya E
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 18280930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT.
    Wormanns D; Ludwig K; Beyer F; Heindel W; Diederich S
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Jan; 15(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 15526207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (< 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer.
    Wang D; Cao L; Li B
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2022; 141(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 36472867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Value of a Computer-aided Detection System Based on Chest Tomosynthesis Imaging for the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules.
    Yamada Y; Shiomi E; Hashimoto M; Abe T; Matsusako M; Saida Y; Ogawa K
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):333-339. PubMed ID: 29206596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Potential contribution of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) to computer-aided detection of lung nodules on MDCT.
    Matsumoto S; Ohno Y; Yamagata H; Nogami M; Kono A; Sugimura K
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):366-70. PubMed ID: 21227621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Deep Convolutional Neural Network-based Software Improves Radiologist Detection of Malignant Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs.
    Sim Y; Chung MJ; Kotter E; Yune S; Kim M; Do S; Han K; Kim H; Yang S; Lee DJ; Choi BW
    Radiology; 2020 Jan; 294(1):199-209. PubMed ID: 31714194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of integrating 3D-mammography (digital breast tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population breast screening trial.
    Bernardi D; Caumo F; Macaskill P; Ciatto S; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 May; 50(7):1232-8. PubMed ID: 24582915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Can radiographers read screening mammograms?
    Wivell G; Denton ER; Eve CB; Inglis JC; Harvey I
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Jan; 58(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 12565207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effectiveness of UK radiographer image reading.
    Blakeley C; Hogg P; Heywood J
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 18203876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Single reading with computer-aided detection performed by selected radiologists in a breast cancer screening program.
    Bargalló X; Santamaría G; Del Amo M; Arguis P; Ríos J; Grau J; Burrel M; Cores E; Velasco M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Nov; 83(11):2019-23. PubMed ID: 25193778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Lung Nodule Detectability of Artificial Intelligence-assisted CT Image Reading in Lung Cancer Screening.
    Zhang Y; Jiang B; Zhang L; Greuter MJW; de Bock GH; Zhang H; Xie X
    Curr Med Imaging; 2022; 18(3):327-334. PubMed ID: 34365951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The potential contribution of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodule detection in multidetector row computed tomography.
    Lee JW; Goo JM; Lee HJ; Kim JH; Kim S; Kim YT
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Nov; 39(11):649-55. PubMed ID: 15486524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Malignant Pulmonary Nodules in Chest Radiographs.
    Yoo H; Kim KH; Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Kalra MK
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Sep; 3(9):e2017135. PubMed ID: 32970157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
    Tanaka R; Takamori M; Uchiyama Y; Nishikawa RM; Shiraishi J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140565. PubMed ID: 25536443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.