390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28643709)
1. Comparison of central corneal thickness with four noncontact devices: An agreement analysis of swept-source technology.
Ozyol E; Özyol P
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 65(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 28643709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
Chen S; Huang J; Wen D; Chen W; Huang D; Wang Q
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20560892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Corneal thickness and volume measurements by swept source anterior segment optical coherence tomography in normal subjects.
Fukuda R; Usui T; Miyai T; Mori Y; Miyata K; Amano S
Curr Eye Res; 2013 May; 38(5):531-6. PubMed ID: 23448300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido, swept-source optical coherence tomography, and Placido-scanning-slit systems.
Lee YW; Choi CY; Yoon GY
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 May; 41(5):1018-29. PubMed ID: 26049835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera.
Gonul S; Koktekir BE; Bakbak B; Gedik S
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014; 77(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 25627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between Pentacam-HR and optical coherence tomographycentral corneal thickness measurements in healthy feline eyes.
Cleymaet AM; Hess AM; Freeman KS
Vet Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 19 Suppl 1():105-14. PubMed ID: 27370363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Keratometry Obtained by a Swept Source OCT-Based Biometer with a Standard Optical Biometer and Scheimpflug Imaging.
Asena L; Akman A; Güngör SG; Dursun Altınörs D
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):882-888. PubMed ID: 29630418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement Between Two Optical Biometers Based on Large Coherence Length SS-OCT and Scheimpflug Imaging/Partial Coherence Interferometry.
Tu R; Yu J; Savini G; Ye J; Ning R; Xiong J; Chen S; Huang J
J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):459-465. PubMed ID: 32644168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noncontact Evaluation of Corneal Grafts: Swept-Source Fourier Domain OCT Versus High-Resolution Scheimpflug Imaging.
Szalai E; Németh G; Hassan Z; Módis L
Cornea; 2017 Apr; 36(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 28079690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.
Gokcinar NB; Yumusak E; Ornek N; Yorubulut S; Onaran Z
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 29984376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of central corneal thickness measurements using Topcon TRK-1P, Zeiss Visante AS-OCT and DGH Pachmate 55 handheld ultrasonic pachymeter.
Wells M; Wu N; Kokkinakis J; Sutton G
Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jul; 96(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 23336739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Between Fourier-Domain OCT, Very High-Frequency Digital Ultrasound, and Scheimpflug Imaging Systems.
Yap TE; Archer TJ; Gobbe M; Reinstein DZ
J Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 32(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 26856428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Canine central corneal thickness measurements via Pentacam-HR
Wolfel AE; Pederson SL; Cleymaet AM; Hess AM; Freeman KS
Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 29034562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new fully automatic measurement optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and agreement with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer.
Yu J; Zhao G; Lei CS; Wan T; Ning R; Xing W; Ma X; Pan H; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Huang J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 37142332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.
Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Corneal Thickness by Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Scheimpflug Camera in Virgin and Treated Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy.
Arnalich-Montiel F; Ortiz-Toquero S; Auladell C; Couceiro A
Cornea; 2018 Jun; 37(6):727-733. PubMed ID: 29384811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement.
Maloca PM; Studer HP; Ambrósio R; Goldblum D; Rothenbuehler S; Barthelmes D; Zweifel S; Scholl HPN; Balaskas K; Tufail A; Hasler PW
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203884. PubMed ID: 30212550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a Scheimpflug camera and an integrated Placido-optical coherence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes.
Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL
Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 93(6):e488-94. PubMed ID: 25495530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Central Corneal Thickness Reproducibility among Ten Different Instruments.
Pierro L; Iuliano L; Gagliardi M; Ambrosi A; Rama P; Bandello F
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Nov; 93(11):1371-1379. PubMed ID: 27571223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
