192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28643910)
1. Evaluation of the 3dMDface system as a tool for soft tissue analysis.
Hong C; Choi K; Kachroo Y; Kwon T; Nguyen A; McComb R; Moon W
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Jun; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):119-124. PubMed ID: 28643910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three-dimensional scanner systems for craniomaxillofacial imaging.
Knoops PG; Beaumont CA; Borghi A; Rodriguez-Florez N; Breakey RW; Rodgers W; Angullia F; Jeelani NU; Schievano S; Dunaway DJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Apr; 70(4):441-449. PubMed ID: 28161205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
Weinberg SM; Naidoo S; Govier DP; Martin RA; Kane AA; Marazita ML
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 16770184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application.
Lübbers HT; Medinger L; Kruse A; Grätz KW; Matthews F
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):763-7. PubMed ID: 20485043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reliability of iWitness photogrammetry in maxillofacial application].
Jiang C; Song Q; He W; Chen S; Hong T
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jun; 33(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26281261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical validation of the Di3D stereophotogrammetry surface imaging system.
Winder RJ; Darvann TA; McKnight W; Magee JD; Ramsay-Baggs P
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 17980940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated landmark extraction for orthodontic measurement of faces using the 3-camera photogrammetry methodology.
Deli R; Di Gioia E; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20072024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does Head Orientation Influence 3D Facial Imaging? A Study on Accuracy and Precision of Stereophotogrammetric Acquisition.
Battistoni G; Cassi D; Magnifico M; Pedrazzi G; Di Blasio M; Vaienti B; Di Blasio A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33920674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system.
Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B
Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Vectra H1 portable three-dimensional photogrammetry system for facial imaging.
Camison L; Bykowski M; Lee WW; Carlson JC; Roosenboom J; Goldstein JA; Losee JE; Weinberg SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 47(3):403-410. PubMed ID: 28919165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
Plooij JM; Swennen GR; Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Schutyser FA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 3dMD photogrammetric photo system in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: Validation of interexaminer variations and perceptions.
Nord F; Ferjencik R; Seifert B; Lanzer M; Gander T; Matthews F; Rücker M; Lübbers HT
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1798-803. PubMed ID: 26421470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of measurements of facial swelling with a stereophotogrammetry optical three-dimensional scanner.
van der Meer WJ; Dijkstra PU; Visser A; Vissink A; Ren Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 52(10):922-7. PubMed ID: 25219776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging.
Baik HS; Lee HJ; Lee KJ
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16548301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements.
Metzler P; Sun Y; Zemann W; Bartella A; Lehner M; Obwegeser JA; Kruse-Gujer AL; Lübbers HT
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 18(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 23559195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
