These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28644567)

  • 1. Reliability of surface electromyography measurements from the suprahyoid muscle complex.
    Kothari M; Stubbs PW; Pedersen AR; Jensen J; Nielsen JF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 44(9):683-690. PubMed ID: 28644567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age and gender effects on submental motor-evoked potentials.
    Sella O; Jones RD; Huckabee ML
    Age (Dordr); 2014; 36(6):9735. PubMed ID: 25502005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping swallowing musculature in the human motor cortex.
    Plowman-Prine EK; Triggs WJ; Malcolm MP; Rosenbek JC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2298-303. PubMed ID: 18723391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at the submental muscle group during volitional swallowing.
    Doeltgen SH; Ridding MC; O'Beirne GA; Dalrymple-Alford J; Huckabee ML
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Mar; 178(1):134-7. PubMed ID: 19118575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for the assessment of knee extensor muscle function.
    Temesi J; Ly SN; Millet GY
    J Neurol Sci; 2017 Apr; 375():442-449. PubMed ID: 28320184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task-dependent differences in corticobulbar excitability of the submental motor projections: Implications for neural control of swallowing.
    Doeltgen SH; Ridding MC; Dalrymple-Alford J; Huckabee ML
    Brain Res Bull; 2011 Jan; 84(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 21093550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corticospinal excitability measurements using transcranial magnetic stimulation are valid with intramuscular electromyography.
    Summers RL; Chen M; Kimberley TJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172152. PubMed ID: 28231250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modulation of short-latency afferent inhibition and short-interval intracortical inhibition by test stimulus intensity and motor-evoked potential amplitude.
    Miyaguchi S; Kojima S; Sasaki R; Tamaki H; Onishi H
    Neuroreport; 2017 Dec; 28(18):1202-1207. PubMed ID: 29064955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of different mylohyoid muscle stimulations on swallowing cortex excitability in healthy subjects.
    Wang Z; Bai J; Cheng K; Zhang X; Fan Z; Chen Y; Ni J
    Behav Brain Res; 2024 Jul; 470():115055. PubMed ID: 38795846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spread of electrical activity at cortical level after repetitive magnetic stimulation in normal subjects.
    Lorenzano C; Gilio F; Inghilleri M; Conte A; Fofi L; Manfredi M; Berardelli A
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12410333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between surface electrodes and ultrasound monitoring to measure TMS evoked muscle contraction.
    Kaczmarczyk I; Rawji V; Rothwell JC; Hodson-Tole E; Sharma N
    Muscle Nerve; 2021 May; 63(5):724-729. PubMed ID: 33533504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on neural plasticity in the motor cortex related to swallowing.
    Momosaki R; Kakuda W; Yamada N; Abo M
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2016 Sep; 39(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 27262135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of the human cerebellum facilitates cortico-bulbar projections in the swallowing motor system.
    Jayasekeran V; Rothwell J; Hamdy S
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2011 Sep; 23(9):831-e341. PubMed ID: 21838728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of remote muscle contraction on transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and silent periods in humans.
    Tazoe T; Sakamoto M; Nakajima T; Endoh T; Komiyama T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 17449319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of olfactory and gustatory stimuli on neural excitability for swallowing.
    Abdul Wahab N; Jones RD; Huckabee ML
    Physiol Behav; 2010 Dec; 101(5):568-75. PubMed ID: 20849867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Muscle imaging: mapping responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation with high-density surface electromyography.
    van Elswijk G; Kleine BU; Overeem S; Eshuis B; Hekkert KD; Stegeman DF
    Cortex; 2008 May; 44(5):609-16. PubMed ID: 18387593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditioning the cortical silent period with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Silbert BI; Thickbroom GW
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):541-4. PubMed ID: 23092703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.
    Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Terao Y; Yuasa K; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 15721074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quadro-pulse stimulation is more effective than paired-pulse stimulation for plasticity induction of the human motor cortex.
    Hamada M; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Arai N; Furubayashi T; Inomata-Terada S; Yugeta A; Matsumoto H; Shirota Y; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2672-82. PubMed ID: 17977788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of low-frequency whole-body vibration on motor-evoked potentials in healthy men.
    Mileva KN; Bowtell JL; Kossev AR
    Exp Physiol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 18658234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.