122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28644820)
41. A formulation of tissue- and water-equivalent materials using the stoichiometric analysis method for CT-number calibration in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Yohannes I; Kolditz D; Langner O; Kalender WA
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1173-90. PubMed ID: 22330195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Calibration of CT Hounsfield units for proton therapy treatment planning: use of kilovoltage and megavoltage images and comparison of parameterized methods.
De Marzi L; Lesven C; Ferrand R; Sage J; Boulé T; Mazal A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4255-76. PubMed ID: 23719506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Dual ring multilayer ionization chamber and theory-based correction technique for scanning proton therapy.
Takayanagi T; Nihongi H; Nishiuchi H; Tadokoro M; Ito Y; Nakashima C; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Matsuda K; Sakae T; Terunuma T
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4150. PubMed ID: 27370135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography.
Doolan PJ; Testa M; Sharp G; Bentefour EH; Royle G; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(5):1901-17. PubMed ID: 25668437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The impact of CT scan energy on range calculation in proton therapy planning.
Grantham KK; Li H; Zhao T; Klein EE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):100-109. PubMed ID: 26699561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Initial implementation of the conversion from the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density in tissue inhomogeneity corrections: an anthropomorphic phantom study of radiotherapy treatment planning.
Tsukihara M; Noto Y; Sasamoto R; Hayakawa T; Saito M
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1378-88. PubMed ID: 25735292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Water equivalent path length measurement in proton radiotherapy using time resolved diode dosimetry.
Gottschalk B; Tang S; Bentefour EH; Cascio EW; Prieels D; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2282-8. PubMed ID: 21626963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Technical note: Flat panel proton radiography with a patient specific imaging field for accurate WEPL assessment.
Seller Oria C; Free J; Marmitt GG; Knäusl B; Brandenburg S; Knopf AC; Meijers A; Langendijk JA; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1756-1765. PubMed ID: 36629844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Dose to 'water-like' media or dose to tissue in MV photons radiotherapy treatment planning: still a matter of debate.
Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):309-37. PubMed ID: 25503312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of tissue heterogeneity on an in vivo range verification technique for proton therapy.
Bentefour el H; Shikui T; Prieels D; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5473-84. PubMed ID: 22864304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.
España S; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7557-71. PubMed ID: 21098912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system.
Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A Monte-Carlo-based study of a single-2D-detector proton-radiography system.
Olivari F; van Goethem MJ; Brandenburg S; van der Graaf ER
Phys Med; 2023 Aug; 112():102636. PubMed ID: 37494764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Patient specific optimization of the relation between CT-hounsfield units and proton stopping power with proton radiography.
Schneider U; Pemler P; Besserer J; Pedroni E; Lomax A; Kaser-Hotz B
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 15719970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Technical Note: On the calculation of stopping-power ratio for stoichiometric calibration in proton therapy.
Ödén J; Zimmerman J; Bujila R; Nowik P; Poludniowski G
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5252-7. PubMed ID: 26328974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images.
Koivula L; Wee L; Korhonen J
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4634. PubMed ID: 27487880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Proton minibeam radiation therapy: Experimental dosimetry evaluation.
Peucelle C; Nauraye C; Patriarca A; Hierso E; Fournier-Bidoz N; Martínez-Rovira I; Prezado Y
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7108-13. PubMed ID: 26632064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.
Nakonechny KD; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 15719960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A procedure for calculation of monitor units for passively scattered proton radiotherapy beams.
Sahoo N; Zhu XR; Arjomandy B; Ciangaru G; Lii M; Amos R; Wu R; Gillin MT
Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5088-97. PubMed ID: 19070243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
