BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28644830)

  • 1. Optimal chemotactic responses in stochastic environments.
    Godány M; Khatri BS; Goldstein RA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179111. PubMed ID: 28644830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal processing in complex chemotaxis pathways.
    Porter SL; Wadhams GH; Armitage JP
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 9(3):153-65. PubMed ID: 21283116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rotation-induced polymorphic transitions in bacterial flagella.
    Vogel R; Stark H
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Apr; 110(15):158104. PubMed ID: 25167316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response kinetics in the complex chemotaxis signalling pathway of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
    Kojadinovic M; Armitage JP; Tindall MJ; Wadhams GH
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Apr; 10(81):20121001. PubMed ID: 23365194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transient dynamic phenotypes as criteria for model discrimination: fold-change detection in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis.
    Hamadeh A; Ingalls B; Sontag E
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Mar; 10(80):20120935. PubMed ID: 23293140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The behavioural response of anaerobic Rhodobacter sphaeroides to temporal stimuli.
    Packer HL; Gauden DE; Armitage JP
    Microbiology (Reading); 1996 Mar; 142 ( Pt 3)():593-599. PubMed ID: 8868434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feedback control architecture and the bacterial chemotaxis network.
    Hamadeh A; Roberts MA; August E; McSharry PE; Maini PK; Armitage JP; Papachristodoulou A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 May; 7(5):e1001130. PubMed ID: 21573199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A chimeric N-terminal Escherichia coli--C-terminal Rhodobacter sphaeroides FliG rotor protein supports bidirectional E. coli flagellar rotation and chemotaxis.
    Morehouse KA; Goodfellow IG; Sockett RE
    J Bacteriol; 2005 Mar; 187(5):1695-701. PubMed ID: 15716440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of the chemotaxis protein CheW from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and its effect on the behaviour of Escherichia coli.
    Hamblin PA; Bourne NA; Armitage JP
    Mol Microbiol; 1997 Apr; 24(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 9140964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bacterial chemotaxis: introverted or extroverted? A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of basic forms of metabolism-based and metabolism-independent behavior using a computational model.
    Egbert MD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63617. PubMed ID: 23717454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rhodobacter sphaeroides: complexity in chemotactic signalling.
    Porter SL; Wadhams GH; Armitage JP
    Trends Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 16(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 18440816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Involvement of transport in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis.
    Ingham CJ; Armitage JP
    J Bacteriol; 1987 Dec; 169(12):5801-7. PubMed ID: 3500167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The chemokinetic and chemotactic behavior of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: two independent responses.
    Packer HL; Armitage JP
    J Bacteriol; 1994 Jan; 176(1):206-12. PubMed ID: 8282697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Extremotaxis': computing with a bacterial-inspired algorithm.
    Nicolau DV; Burrage K; Nicolau DV; Maini PK
    Biosystems; 2008; 94(1-2):47-54. PubMed ID: 18611427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency-dependent Escherichia coli chemotaxis behavior.
    Zhu X; Si G; Deng N; Ouyang Q; Wu T; He Z; Jiang L; Luo C; Tu Y
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Mar; 108(12):128101. PubMed ID: 22540625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CheR- and CheB-dependent chemosensory adaptation system of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
    Martin AC; Wadhams GH; Shah DS; Porter SL; Mantotta JC; Craig TJ; Verdult PH; Jones H; Armitage JP
    J Bacteriol; 2001 Dec; 183(24):7135-44. PubMed ID: 11717272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The CheYs of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
    Porter SL; Wadhams GH; Martin AC; Byles ED; Lancaster DE; Armitage JP
    J Biol Chem; 2006 Oct; 281(43):32694-704. PubMed ID: 16950782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferring the Chemotactic Strategy of P. putida and E. coli Using Modified Kramers-Moyal Coefficients.
    Pohl O; Hintsche M; Alirezaeizanjani Z; Seyrich M; Beta C; Stark H
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005329. PubMed ID: 28114420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the carotenoid bandshift and oxanol dyes to measure membrane potential changes during chemotactic stimulation of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides and Escherichia coli.
    Armitage JP; Evans MC
    FEBS Lett; 1981 Apr; 126(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 7016583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Swimming patterns and dynamics of simulated Escherichia coli bacteria.
    Zonia L; Bray D
    J R Soc Interface; 2009 Nov; 6(40):1035-46. PubMed ID: 19324687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.