These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28645204)

  • 1. When Homoplasy Is Not Homoplasy: Dissecting Trait Evolution by Contrasting Composite and Reductive Coding.
    Torres-Montúfar A; Borsch T; Ochoterena H
    Syst Biol; 2018 May; 67(3):543-551. PubMed ID: 28645204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increasing the number of discrete character states for continuous characters generates well-resolved trees that do not reflect phylogeny.
    Bardin J; Rouget I; Yacobucci MM; Cecca F
    Integr Zool; 2014 Aug; 9(4):531-41. PubMed ID: 24148350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method for inferring the rate of evolution of homologous characters that can potentially improve phylogenetic inference, resolve deep divergence and correct systematic biases.
    Cummins CA; McInerney JO
    Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):833-44. PubMed ID: 21804093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A reconsideration of inapplicable characters, and an approximation with step-matrix recoding.
    Goloboff PA; De Laet J; Ríos-Tamayo D; Szumik CA
    Cladistics; 2021 Oct; 37(5):596-629. PubMed ID: 34570932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring and testing hypotheses of cladistic character dependence by using character compatibility.
    O'Keefe FR; Wagner PJ
    Syst Biol; 2001; 50(5):657-75. PubMed ID: 12116937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Continuous Traits Can Improve Morphological Phylogenetics.
    Parins-Fukuchi C
    Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):328-339. PubMed ID: 28945906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Invariant Nature of a Morphological Character and Character State: Insights from Gene Regulatory Networks.
    Tarasov S
    Syst Biol; 2020 Mar; 69(2):392-400. PubMed ID: 31372653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Circumstances in which parsimony but not compatibility will be provably misleading.
    Scotland RW; Steel M
    Syst Biol; 2015 May; 64(3):492-504. PubMed ID: 25634097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection of Character Coding Method Is Not Phylogenetically Neutral: A Test Case Using Hominoids.
    Worthington S
    Folia Primatol (Basel); 2017; 88(5):385-400. PubMed ID: 29130999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An algorithm for Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis with Inapplicable Data.
    Brazeau MD; Guillerme T; Smith MR
    Syst Biol; 2019 Jul; 68(4):619-631. PubMed ID: 30535172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is homoplasy or lineage sorting the source of incongruent mtdna and nuclear gene trees in the stiff-tailed ducks (Nomonyx-Oxyura)?
    McCracken K; Sorenson M
    Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 15805009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The recognition and evaluation of homoplasy in primate and human evolution.
    Lockwood CA; Fleagle JG
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1999; Suppl 29():189-232. PubMed ID: 10601987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EVOLUTIONARY CHARACTER ANALYSIS: TRACING CHARACTER CHANGE ON A CLADOGRAM.
    Mickevich MF; Weller SJ
    Cladistics; 1990 Jun; 6(2):137-170. PubMed ID: 34933510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The size of the character state space affects the occurrence and detection of homoplasy: modelling the probability of incompatibility for unordered phylogenetic characters.
    Hoyal Cuthill J
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Feb; 366():24-32. PubMed ID: 25451518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Homoplasy-Based Partitioning Outperforms Alternatives in Bayesian Analysis of Discrete Morphological Data.
    Rosa BB; Melo GAR; Barbeitos MS
    Syst Biol; 2019 Jul; 68(4):657-671. PubMed ID: 30649562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to identify (as opposed to define) a homoplasy: examples from fossil and living great apes.
    Begun DR
    J Hum Evol; 2007 May; 52(5):559-72. PubMed ID: 17434574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artifacts of Coding Amino Acids and Other Composite Characters for Phylogenetic Analysis.
    Simmons MP; Freudenstein JV
    Cladistics; 2002 Jun; 18(3):354-365. PubMed ID: 34911253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Homologies in phylogenetic analyses--concept and tests.
    Richter S
    Theory Biosci; 2005 Nov; 124(2):105-20. PubMed ID: 17046351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Character trees from transcriptome data: Origin and individuation of morphological characters and the so-called "species signal".
    Musser JM; Wagner GP
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2015 Nov; 324(7):588-604. PubMed ID: 26175303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On defining a unique phylogenetic tree with homoplastic characters.
    Goloboff PA; Wilkinson M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2018 May; 122():95-101. PubMed ID: 29407481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.