381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28645665)
1. Experimental evaluation of stress distribution with narrow diameter implants: A finite element analysis.
Cinel S; Celik E; Sagirkaya E; Sahin O
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):417-425. PubMed ID: 28645665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Static and Dynamic Stress Analysis of Standard- and Narrow-Diameter Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Sahin SC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):e58-e68. PubMed ID: 32724919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants.
Bal BT; Cağlar A; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bankoğlu M; Eser A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e27-38. PubMed ID: 23377079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Bankoğlu Güngör M; Yılmaz H
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 27063944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.
Deste Gökay G; Oyar P; Gökçimen G; Durkan R
BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):545. PubMed ID: 38730391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
Bahadirli G; Yilmaz S; Jones T; Sen D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e117-e126. PubMed ID: 30231094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of stress distribution around CFR‑PEEK implants and titanium implants with different prosthetic crowns: A finite element analysis.
Tamrakar SK; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Rao S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(3):359-367. PubMed ID: 34597479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study.
Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A; Sevimay M; Soykan E; Unsal E
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Feb; 91(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 14970760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 3-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
Ioannidis A; Gallucci GO; Jung RE; Borzangy S; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Nov; 42(11):1060-70. PubMed ID: 26440201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element stress analysis of Ti-6Al-4V and partially stabilized zirconia dental implant during clenching.
Choi AH; Matinlinna JP; Ben-Nissan B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Sep; 70(5):353-61. PubMed ID: 21815837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress Analysis Around Reduced-Diameter Zirconia and Titanium One-Piece Implants With and Without Microthreads in the Neck: Experimental and Finite Element Analysis.
Al-Zordk W; Ghazy M; El-Anwar M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 32142567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants.
de Matos JDM; Lopes GDRS; Nakano LJN; Ramos NC; Vasconcelos JEL; Bottino MA; Tribst JPM
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Feb; 25(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 34559574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
