506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28646014)
21. Diagnostic performance of
Rahbar K; Afshar-Oromieh A; Seifert R; Wagner S; Schäfers M; Bögemann M; Weckesser M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2055-2061. PubMed ID: 30027419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of
Fendler WP; Ferdinandus J; Czernin J; Eiber M; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Wu IK; Lawhn-Heath C; Pampaloni MH; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Gartmann J; Murthy V; Slavik R; Carroll PR; Herrmann K; Calais J; Hope TA
J Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 61(12):1793-1799. PubMed ID: 32358094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection level and pattern of positive lesions using PSMA PET/CT for staging prior to radiation therapy.
Schmidt-Hegemann NS; Fendler WP; Buchner A; Stief C; Rogowski P; Niyazi M; Eze C; Li M; Bartenstein P; Belka C; Ganswindt U
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):176. PubMed ID: 29126446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Unexpected significant findings non-related to prostate cancer identified using combined prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/CT and diagnostic CT scan in primary staging for prostate cancer.
McEwan L; McBean R; Yaxley J; Wong D
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 63(3):318-323. PubMed ID: 30840361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. (68) Ga-PSMA has a high detection rate of prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa in patients being considered for salvage radiation treatment.
van Leeuwen PJ; Stricker P; Hruby G; Kneebone A; Ting F; Thompson B; Nguyen Q; Ho B; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2016 May; 117(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 26683282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of [
Frenzel T; Tienken M; Abel M; Berliner C; Klutmann S; Beyersdorff D; Schwarz R; Krüll A; Bannas P
Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Jul; 194(7):646-654. PubMed ID: 29572670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of
De Man K; Piron S; Van Laeken N; Delrue L; Fonteyne V; Lumen N; Van den Broeck B; Kersemans K; Ost P; Schelfhout V
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Oct; 24(5):750-758. PubMed ID: 35411446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy.
Morigi JJ; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Ho B; Nguyen Q; Hruby G; Fogarty G; Jagavkar R; Kneebone A; Hickey A; Fanti S; Tarlinton L; Emmett L
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1185-90. PubMed ID: 26112024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of
Metser U; Zukotynski K; Mak V; Langer D; MacCrostie P; Finelli A; Kapoor A; Chin J; Lavallée L; Klotz LH; Hagerty M; Hildebrand C; Bauman G
Radiology; 2022 May; 303(2):414-422. PubMed ID: 35076300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic sensitivity of Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT in prostate carcinoma: A comparative analysis with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
Lawal IO; Ankrah AO; Mokgoro NP; Vorster M; Maes A; Sathekge MM
Prostate; 2017 Aug; 77(11):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 28649735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Could 68-Ga PSMA PET/CT become a new tool in the decision-making strategy of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence of PSA after radical prostatectomy? A preliminary, monocentric series.
De Bari B; Mazzola R; Aiello D; Fersino S; Gregucci F; Alongi P; Nicodemo M; Cavalleri S; Salgarello M; Alongi F
Radiol Med; 2018 Sep; 123(9):719-725. PubMed ID: 29687208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance of
Bailey J; Piert M
Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Sep; 18(11):84. PubMed ID: 28889366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in Patients With Biochemical Prostate Cancer Recurrence and Negative 18F-Choline-PET/CT.
Bluemel C; Krebs M; Polat B; Linke F; Eiber M; Samnick S; Lapa C; Lassmann M; Riedmiller H; Czernin J; Rubello D; Bley T; Kropf S; Wester HJ; Buck AK; Herrmann K
Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 41(7):515-21. PubMed ID: 26975008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ga-68-HBED-CC-PSMA-Ligand-PET/CT before Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Jilg CA; Drendel V; Rischke HC; Beck T; Vach W; Schaal K; Wetterauer U; Schultze-Seemann W; Meyer PT
Theranostics; 2017; 7(6):1770-1780. PubMed ID: 28529650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of
Han S; Woo S; Kim YJ; Suh CH
Eur Urol; 2018 Aug; 74(2):179-190. PubMed ID: 29678358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Current status of theranostics in prostate cancer.
Virgolini I; Decristoforo C; Haug A; Fanti S; Uprimny C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 45(3):471-495. PubMed ID: 29282518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of
Raveenthiran S; Esler R; Yaxley J; Kyle S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Oct; 46(11):2280-2288. PubMed ID: 31332498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38.
Liu C; Liu T; Zhang N; Liu Y; Li N; Du P; Yang Y; Liu M; Gong K; Yang X; Zhu H; Yan K; Yang Z
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Oct; 45(11):1852-1861. PubMed ID: 29717333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Relationships between serum PSA levels, Gleason scores and results of 68Ga-PSMAPET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.
Sanli Y; Kuyumcu S; Sanli O; Buyukkaya F; İribaş A; Alcin G; Darendeliler E; Ozluk Y; Yildiz SO; Turkmen C
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):709-717. PubMed ID: 28900854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Utility of Ga
Tarr GP; Kashyap P; Dixit DD; Willams AK; Koya MP; Lim R
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Feb; 64(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 31885207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
