These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28646207)

  • 1. Computer-aided implant design for the restoration of cranial defects.
    Chen X; Xu L; Li X; Egger J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):4199. PubMed ID: 28646207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Custom implant design for large cranial defects.
    Marreiros FM; Heuzé Y; Verius M; Unterhofer C; Freysinger W; Recheis W
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2217-2230. PubMed ID: 27358081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital planning of cranial implants.
    van der Meer WJ; Bos RR; Vissink A; Visser A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 51(5):450-2. PubMed ID: 23266152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer aided design of large-format prefabricated cranial plates.
    Dean D; Min KJ; Bond A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):819-32. PubMed ID: 14600623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional reconstruction of cranial defect using active contour model and image registration.
    Liao YL; Lu CF; Sun YN; Wu CT; Lee JD; Lee ST; Wu YT
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Feb; 49(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 21128121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cranial reconstruction: 3D biomodel and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing.
    Jardini AL; Larosa MA; Maciel Filho R; Zavaglia CA; Bernardes LF; Lambert CS; Calderoni DR; Kharmandayan P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1877-84. PubMed ID: 25175080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synthetic skull bone defects for automatic patient-specific craniofacial implant design.
    Li J; Gsaxner C; Pepe A; Morais A; Alves V; von Campe G; Wallner J; Egger J
    Sci Data; 2021 Jan; 8(1):36. PubMed ID: 33514740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3D surface accuracy of CAD generated skull defect contour.
    Winder RJ; McKnight W; McRitchie I; Montgomery D; Wulf J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():574-6. PubMed ID: 16404124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional deep learning to automatically generate cranial implant geometry.
    Wu CT; Yang YH; Chang YZ
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2683. PubMed ID: 35177704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided planning and reconstruction of cranial 3D implants.
    Gall M; Xing Li ; Xiaojun Chen ; Schmalstieg D; Egger J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1179-1183. PubMed ID: 28268535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cranioplasty using computer-designed implants (preliminary report)].
    Gulyás G; Pulay G; Volant M; Bárdosi T; Farkas G; Juharosi Z
    Orv Hetil; 1995 Oct; 136(44):2393-7. PubMed ID: 7478484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fabrication of Patient Specific Titanium Implants for Correction of Cranial Defects: A Technique to Improve Anatomic Contours and Accuracy.
    Nagarjuna M; Ganesh P; Srinivasaiah VS; Kumar K; Shetty S; Salins PC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 26(8):2409-11. PubMed ID: 26491922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Customised fabricated implants after previous failed cranioplasty.
    Goh RC; Chang CN; Lin CL; Lo LJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Sep; 63(9):1479-84. PubMed ID: 19766072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Traumatic cranial defects reconstructed with the HTR-PMI cranioplastic implant.
    Roberson JB; Rosenberg WS
    J Craniomaxillofac Trauma; 1997; 3(2):8-13. PubMed ID: 11951420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reverse engineering techniques for cranioplasty: a case study.
    Maravelakis E; David K; Antoniadis A; Manios A; Bilalis N; Papaharilaou Y
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17852651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [PEEK customized implant for skull esthetic reconstruction].
    Foletti JM; Lari N; Dumas P; Compes P; Guyot L
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2012 Dec; 113(6):468-71. PubMed ID: 23182690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polymethyl Methacrylate Custom-Made Prosthesis: A Novel Three-Dimension Printing-Aided Fabrication Technique for Cranial and/or Orbital Reconstruction.
    Martinez-Seijas P; Díaz-Galvis LA; Hernando J; Leizaola-Cardesa IO; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; Gómez-Moreno G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 29(5):e438-e440. PubMed ID: 29521751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printing Guide for Single-Stage Skull Bone Tumor Surgery: Novel Software Workflow with Manufacturing of Prefabricated Jigs for Bone Resection and Reconstruction.
    Wu CT; Lu TC; Chan CS; Lin TC
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Mar; 147():e416-e427. PubMed ID: 33359737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prosthesis-guided implant restoration of an auricular defect using computed tomography and 3-dimensional photographic imaging technologies: a clinical report.
    Wang S; Leng X; Zheng Y; Zhang D; Wu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 25444284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skull defect reconstruction based on a new hybrid level set.
    Zhang Z; Zhang R; Song Z
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3343-51. PubMed ID: 25227044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.