969 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28646360)
1. Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Rolfson O; Mäkelä KT; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 28646360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LUMiC
Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA.
Chughtai M; Mistry JB; Diedrich AM; Jauregui JJ; Elmallah RK; Bonutti PM; Harwin SF; Malkani AL; Kolisek FR; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2181-7. PubMed ID: 27106128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?
Brüggemann A; Fredlund E; Mallmin H; Hailer NP
Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27892748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.
Lachiewicz PF; O'Dell JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29529665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?
Hooper N; Sargeant H; Frampton C; Hooper G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3806-10. PubMed ID: 26373851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?
Jafari SM; Bender B; Coyle C; Parvizi J; Sharkey PF; Hozack WJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 19809857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Metasul Bearings Provides Good Results in Active Young Patients: A Concise Followup.
Delaunay CP; Putman S; Puliéro B; Bégin M; Migaud H; Bonnomet F
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2126-33. PubMed ID: 27278679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncemented cups with and without screw holes in primary THA: a Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register study with 22,725 hips.
Otten V; Mukka S; Nilsson K; Crnalic S; Kärrholm J
Acta Orthop; 2019 Jun; 90(3):258-263. PubMed ID: 30955399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term survival of the trabecular metal cup is similar to that of standard cups used in acetabular revision surgery.
Mohaddes M; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J
Acta Orthop; 2015 Feb; 86(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 25399966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increased Mortality After Prosthetic Joint Infection in Primary THA.
Gundtoft PH; Pedersen AB; Varnum C; Overgaard S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Nov; 475(11):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 28236084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of dual mobility cup cemented into a tantalum acetabular shell for hip revision with large bone loss can decrease dislocation risk without increasing the risk of mechanical failure.
Hitz O; Le Baron M; Jacquet C; Argenson JN; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Flecher X
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Apr; 110(2):103739. PubMed ID: 37918693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?
Pitto RP; Sedel L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2213-8. PubMed ID: 27249955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
