209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28646574)
1. A habitat-based approach to predict impacts of marine protected areas on fishers.
Teixeira JB; Moura RL; Mills M; Klein C; Brown CJ; Adams VM; Grantham H; Watts M; Faria D; Amado-Filho GM; Bastos AC; Lourival R; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1096-1106. PubMed ID: 28646574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating approaches for scaling-up community-based marine-protected areas into socially equitable and ecologically representative networks.
Kockel A; Ban NC; Costa M; Dearden P
Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 31206826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficient and equitable design of marine protected areas in Fiji through inclusion of stakeholder-specific objectives in conservation planning.
Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Ban NC; Álvarez-Romero JG; Jupiter S; Adams VM
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1378-89. PubMed ID: 25916976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accounting for enforcement costs in the spatial allocation of marine zones.
Davis K; Kragt M; Gelcich S; Schilizzi S; Pannell D
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):226-37. PubMed ID: 25103090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas.
Klein CJ; Chan A; Kircher L; Cundiff AJ; Gardner N; Hrovat Y; Scholz A; Kendall BE; Airamé S
Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 18325043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incentivizing biodiversity conservation in artisanal fishing communities through territorial user rights and business model innovation.
Gelcich S; Donlan CJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 25737027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ocean zoning for conservation, fisheries and marine renewable energy: assessing trade-offs and co-location opportunities.
Yates KL; Schoeman DS; Klein CJ
J Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 152():201-9. PubMed ID: 25684567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trade-offs between data resolution, accuracy, and cost when choosing information to plan reserves for coral reef ecosystems.
Tulloch VJ; Klein CJ; Jupiter SD; Tulloch AI; Roelfsema C; Possingham HP
J Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 188():108-119. PubMed ID: 27940319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Drivers of redistribution of fishing and non-fishing effort after the implementation of a marine protected area network.
Cabral RB; Gaines SD; Johnson BA; Bell TW; White C
Ecol Appl; 2017 Mar; 27(2):416-428. PubMed ID: 28207172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries.
Kockel A; Ban NC; Costa M; Dearden P
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233339. PubMed ID: 32428006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marine nature conservation and conflicts with fisheries.
Grip K; Blomqvist S
Ambio; 2020 Jul; 49(7):1328-1340. PubMed ID: 31749103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
Sutton NJ; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Behavioral and environmental influences on fishing rewards and the outcomes of alternative management scenarios for large tropical rivers.
Hallwass G; Lopes PF; Juras AA; Silvano RA
J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():274-82. PubMed ID: 23764509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The least-cost biodiversity impact mitigation hierarchy with a focus on marine fisheries and bycatch issues.
Squires D; Garcia S
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):989-997. PubMed ID: 30028536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A conservation planning approach to mitigate the impacts of leakage from protected area networks.
Bode M; Tulloch AI; Mills M; Venter O; Ando AW
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):765-74. PubMed ID: 25494874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marine spatial planning to solve increasing conflicts at sea: A framework for prioritizing offshore windfarms and marine protected areas.
Boussarie G; Kopp D; Lavialle G; Mouchet M; Morfin M
J Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 339():117857. PubMed ID: 37031598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating fisheries conservation strategies in the socio-ecological system: A grid-based dynamic model to link spatial conservation prioritization tools with tactical fisheries management.
Li Y; Sun M; Zhang C; Zhang Y; Xu B; Ren Y; Chen Y
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230946. PubMed ID: 32243469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trade-offs and efficiencies in optimal budget-constrained multispecies corridor networks.
Dilkina B; Houtman R; Gomes CP; Montgomery CA; McKelvey KS; Kendall K; Graves TA; Bernstein R; Schwartz MK
Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 27677418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Addressing transboundary conservation challenges through marine spatial prioritization.
Gissi E; McGowan J; Venier C; Carlo DD; Musco F; Menegon S; Mackelworth P; Agardy T; Possingham H
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 29767466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
