These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28646665)

  • 1. The N400 in processing repeated name and pronoun anaphors in sentences and discourse.
    Almor A; Nair VA; Boiteau TW; Vendemia JMC
    Brain Lang; 2017 Oct; 173():52-66. PubMed ID: 28646665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An electrophysiological study of mood, modal context, and anaphora.
    Dwivedi VD; Phillips NA; Laguë-Beauvais M; Baum SR
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1117(1):135-53. PubMed ID: 16997288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing.
    Swaab TY; Camblin CC; Gordon PC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):715-26. PubMed ID: 15200700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Repeated Name Penalty, the Overt Pronoun Penalty, and Topic in Japanese.
    Shoji S; Dubinsky S; Almor A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):89-106. PubMed ID: 27016081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures.
    Streb J; Rösler F; Hennighausen E
    Brain Lang; 1999 Nov; 70(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 10550231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Referential processing in the human brain: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.
    Barkley C; Kluender R; Kutas M
    Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 1629():143-59. PubMed ID: 26456801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect.
    van Berkum JJ; Zwitserlood P; Hagoort P; Brown CM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):701-18. PubMed ID: 14561457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the frequency of the antecedent noun affect the resolution of pronominal anaphors? An ERP study.
    Heine A; Tamm S; Hofmann M; Hutzler F; Jacobs AM
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 May; 400(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 16503377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Co-referential Processing of Pronouns and Repeated Names in Italian.
    de Carvalho Maia J; Vernice M; Gelormini-Lezama C; Lima ML; Almor A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Apr; 46(2):497-506. PubMed ID: 27578523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400.
    van Berkum JJ; Hagoort P; Brown CM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1999 Nov; 11(6):657-71. PubMed ID: 10601747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Singular and plural pronominal reference in Spanish.
    Gelormini-Lezama C; Almor A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Jun; 43(3):299-313. PubMed ID: 23733385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the Repeated Name Penalty and the Overt Pronoun Penalty in Spanish.
    Gelormini-Lezama C
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Apr; 47(2):377-389. PubMed ID: 29086144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases.
    Albrecht JE; Clifton C
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):599-610. PubMed ID: 9610128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in the processing of anaphoric reference between closely related languages: neurophysiological evidence.
    Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 9():55. PubMed ID: 18588672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing pronouns without antecedents: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Filik R; Sanford AJ; Leuthold H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18284347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: evidence from ERPs.
    Nieuwland MS; Van Berkum JJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):155-67. PubMed ID: 16956594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rate of speech affects the comprehension of pronouns in children with developmental language disorder.
    Abbott N; Nip I; Love T
    Front Lang Sci; 2024; 3():. PubMed ID: 39268499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related differences in understanding pronominal reference in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation.
    Lee CL; Lai CH
    Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):275-287. PubMed ID: 37650796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.