BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28647330)

  • 1. Effect of skim milk treated with high hydrostatic pressure on permeate flux and fouling during ultrafiltration.
    Leu M; Marciniak A; Chamberland J; Pouliot Y; Bazinet L; Doyen A
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7071-7082. PubMed ID: 28647330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of annatto addition and bleaching treatments on ultrafiltration flux during production of 80% whey protein concentrate and 80% serum protein concentrate.
    Adams MC; Zulewska J; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Apr; 96(4):2035-2047. PubMed ID: 23415538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microfiltration of skim milk and modified skim milk using a 0.1-µm ceramic uniform transmembrane pressure system at temperatures of 50, 55, 60, and 65°C.
    Hurt EE; Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Feb; 98(2):765-80. PubMed ID: 25497798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preparation of milk protein concentrates by ultrafiltration and continuous diafiltration: Effect of process design on overall efficiency.
    Gavazzi-April C; Benoit S; Doyen A; Britten M; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):9670-9679. PubMed ID: 30172402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-sodium Cheddar cheese: Effect of fortification of cheese milk with ultrafiltration retentate and high-hydrostatic pressure treatment of cheese.
    Ozturk M; Govindasamy-Lucey S; Jaeggi JJ; Johnson ME; Lucey JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Oct; 98(10):6713-26. PubMed ID: 26277316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manufacture of modified milk protein concentrate utilizing injection of carbon dioxide.
    Marella C; Salunke P; Biswas AC; Kommineni A; Metzger LE
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):3577-89. PubMed ID: 25828657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of microfiltration concentration factor on serum protein removal from skim milk using spiral-wound polymeric membranes.
    Beckman SL; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6199-212. PubMed ID: 23891300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of soluble calcium and lactose on limiting flux and serum protein removal during skim milk microfiltration.
    Adams MC; Hurt EE; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):7483-97. PubMed ID: 26298759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimization of protein fractionation by skim milk microfiltration: Choice of ceramic membrane pore size and filtration temperature.
    Jørgensen CE; Abrahamsen RK; Rukke EO; Johansen AG; Schüller RB; Skeie SB
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6164-6179. PubMed ID: 27265169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance assessment of membrane distillation for skim milk and whey processing.
    Hausmann A; Sanciolo P; Vasiljevic T; Kulozik U; Duke M
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 24268403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Ultrafiltration of Milk Prior to Fermentation on Mass Balance and Process Efficiency in Greek-Style Yogurt Manufacture.
    Paredes Valencia A; Doyen A; Benoit S; Margni M; Pouliot Y
    Foods; 2018 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 30181438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A microfiltration process to maximize removal of serum proteins from skim milk before cheese making.
    Nelson BK; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 May; 88(5):1891-900. PubMed ID: 15829684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-fat set yogurt made from milk subjected to combinations of high hydrostatic pressure and thermal processing.
    Harte F; Luedecke L; Swanson B; Barbosa-Cánovas GV
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Apr; 86(4):1074-82. PubMed ID: 12741531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure and whey proteins on the disruption of casein micelle isolates.
    Harte FM; Gurram SR; Luedecke LO; Swanson BG; Barbosa-Cánovas GV
    J Dairy Res; 2007 Nov; 74(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 17961286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardization of milk using cold ultrafiltration retentates for the manufacture of Swiss cheese: effect of altering coagulation conditions on yield and cheese quality.
    Govindasamy-Lucey S; Jaeggi JJ; Martinelli C; Johnson ME; Lucey JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jun; 94(6):2719-30. PubMed ID: 21605741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Process efficiency of casein separation from milk using polymeric spiral-wound microfiltration membranes.
    Mercier-Bouchard D; Benoit S; Doyen A; Britten M; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):8838-8848. PubMed ID: 28843690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Processing Temperature on Membrane Performance and Characteristics of Process Streams Generated during Ultrafiltration of Skim Milk.
    Puri R; Singh U; A O'Mahony J
    Foods; 2020 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 33238626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sieving effect of heat-denatured milk proteins during ultrafiltration of skim milk. I. The preliminary approach.
    Erdem YK; Yuksel Z
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jun; 88(6):1941-6. PubMed ID: 15905423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standardization of milk using cold ultrafiltration retentates for the manufacture of parmesan cheese.
    Govindasamy-Lucey S; Jaeggi JJ; Bostley AL; Johnson ME; Lucey JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Sep; 87(9):2789-99. PubMed ID: 15375036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.