169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28648411)
1. Visual feedback explains why propointing is better than antipointing in spatial neglect.
Utz KS; Hesse C; Hintz A; Grüneberger D; Kulke H; Roth I; Klos T; Kromichal V; Melms A; Schupp W; Kohl D; Schenk T
Cortex; 2018 Jan; 98():114-127. PubMed ID: 28648411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of right temporal lobe structures in off-line action: evidence from lesion-behavior mapping in stroke patients.
Rossit S; Malhotra P; Muir K; Reeves I; Duncan G; Harvey M
Cereb Cortex; 2011 Dec; 21(12):2751-61. PubMed ID: 21508302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The antipointing task: vector inversion is supported by a perceptual estimate of visual space.
Heath M; Maraj A; Maddigan M; Binsted G
J Mot Behav; 2009 Oct; 41(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 19460747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating visual bias and effect of proprioceptive feedback in unilateral neglect.
Chiba Y; Nishihara K; Haga N
J Clin Neurosci; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1148-52. PubMed ID: 20580558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediate and delayed reaching in hemispatial neglect.
Rossit S; Muir K; Reeves I; Duncan G; Birschel P; Harvey M
Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1563-72. PubMed ID: 18771672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control.
Maraj A; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 202(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 20012599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The egocentric reference deviation of neglect patients is influenced by visuospatial attention.
Richard C; Rousseaux M; Honoré J
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1784-91. PubMed ID: 16154454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electroencephalographic evidence of vector inversion in antipointing.
Heath M; Bell J; Holroyd CB; Krigolson O
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 221(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22710619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visuospatial neglect in action.
Harvey M; Rossit S
Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1018-28. PubMed ID: 21978832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect.
Kerkhoff G
Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(7):1073-86. PubMed ID: 10775717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The visual properties of proximal and remote distractors differentially influence reaching planning times: evidence from pro- and antipointing tasks.
Heath M; DeSimone JC
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3259-3268. PubMed ID: 27405998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pointing and antipointing in Müller-Lyer figures: Why illusion effects need to be scaled.
Hesse C; Franz VH; Schenk T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 26322691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dissociation between egocentric and allocentric visuospatial and tactile neglect in acute stroke.
Marsh EB; Hillis AE
Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1215-20. PubMed ID: 18761135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The neural basis of visuomotor deficits in hemispatial neglect.
Rossit S; Malhotra P; Muir K; Reeves I; Duncan G; Birschel P; Harvey M
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2149-53. PubMed ID: 19394349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Straight-ahead pointing correlates with long-line bisection in neglect patients.
Richard C; Honoré J; Bernati T; Rousseaux M
Cortex; 2004 Feb; 40(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 15070003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attention in action: evidence from on-line corrections in left visual neglect.
Rossit S; McIntosh RD; Malhotra P; Butler SH; Muir K; Harvey M
Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1124-35. PubMed ID: 22044647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study on the independence of egocentric and allocentric neglect.
Turgut N; Mödden C; Brumund T; Eling P; Hildebrandt H
Cortex; 2017 Nov; 96():95-104. PubMed ID: 28988121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antipointing Reaches Do Not Adhere to Width-Based Manipulations of Fitts' (1954) Equation.
Pecora M; Tremblay L; Heath M
Motor Control; 2019 Nov; 24(2):222-237. PubMed ID: 31693993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do supine position and deprivation of visual environment influence spatial neglect?
Gassama S; Deplancke A; Saj A; Honoré J; Rousseaux M
J Neurol; 2011 Jul; 258(7):1288-94. PubMed ID: 21287184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
