These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28648467)

  • 1. Differentiating "could" from "should": Developmental changes in modal cognition.
    Shtulman A; Phillips J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Jan; 165():161-182. PubMed ID: 28648467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's developing metaethical judgments.
    Schmidt MFH; Gonzalez-Cabrera I; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Dec; 164():163-177. PubMed ID: 28822880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Could it? Should it? Cognitive reflection facilitates children's reasoning about possibility and permissibility.
    Shtulman A; Harrington C; Hetzel C; Kim J; Palumbo C; Rountree-Shtulman T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Nov; 235():105727. PubMed ID: 37385146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can only one person be right? The development of objectivism and social preferences regarding widely shared and controversial moral beliefs.
    Heiphetz L; Young LL
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():78-90. PubMed ID: 27260661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preschoolers, but not adults, treat instrumental norms as categorical imperatives.
    Dahl A; Schmidt MFH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Jan; 165():85-100. PubMed ID: 28826577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children's Ideas About What Can Really Happen: The Impact of Age and Religious Background.
    Payir A; Mcloughlin N; Cui YK; Davoodi T; Clegg JM; Harris PL; Corriveau KH
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Oct; 45(10):e13054. PubMed ID: 34647360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improbable or impossible? How children reason about the possibility of extraordinary events.
    Shtulman A; Carey S
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(3):1015-32. PubMed ID: 17517019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morality constrains the default representation of what is possible.
    Phillips J; Cushman F
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 May; 114(18):4649-4654. PubMed ID: 28420792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moral judgements reflect default representations of possibility.
    Acierno J; Mischel S; Phillips J
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 377(1866):20210341. PubMed ID: 36314154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why wearing a yellow hat is impossible: Chinese and U.S. children's possibility judgments.
    Nissel J; Xu J; Wu L; Bricken Z; Clegg JM; Li H; Woolley JD
    Cognition; 2024 Oct; 251():105856. PubMed ID: 39053347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How people evaluate individuals who act morally prior to acting immorally: An examination of developmental change in moral evaluation, social preference, and prediction of moral behaviors.
    Motoyama H; Ikeda A; Okumura Y
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2024 Dec; 248():106065. PubMed ID: 39241322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judgments about fact and fiction by children from religious and nonreligious backgrounds.
    Corriveau KH; Chen EE; Harris PL
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Mar; 39(2):353-82. PubMed ID: 24995520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wondering how: Children's and adults' explanations for mundane, improbable, and extraordinary events.
    Woolley JD; Cornelius CA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 28176289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seeing is believing: children's explanations of commonplace, magical, and extraordinary transformations.
    Rosengren KS; Hickling AK
    Child Dev; 1994 Dec; 65(6):1605-26. PubMed ID: 7859545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is or ought? Reactions to violations help children to distinguish norms and regularities.
    Riggs AE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jun; 194():104822. PubMed ID: 32126318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of intention, outcome and question-wording on children's and adults' moral judgments.
    Nobes G; Panagiotaki G; Bartholomew KJ
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():190-204. PubMed ID: 27649094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preschoolers' social and moral judgments of third-party helpers and hinderers align with infants' social evaluations.
    Van de Vondervoort JW; Hamlin JK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Dec; 164():136-151. PubMed ID: 28822295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Similarity Heuristic in Children's Possibility Judgments.
    Goulding BW; Friedman O
    Child Dev; 2021 Mar; 92(2):662-671. PubMed ID: 33521948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abused, neglected, and nonmaltreated children's conceptions of moral and social-conventional transgressions.
    Smetana JG; Kelly M; Twentyman CT
    Child Dev; 1984 Feb; 55(1):277-87. PubMed ID: 6705629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crime but not punishment? Children are more lenient toward rule-breaking when the "spirit of the law" is unbroken.
    Bregant J; Wellbery I; Shaw A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Feb; 178():266-282. PubMed ID: 30415148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.