These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28649206)
1. The Heuristic Value of Krueger JI; Heck PR Front Psychol; 2017; 8():908. PubMed ID: 28649206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hypothesis-Testing Demands Trustworthy Data-A Simulation Approach to Inferential Statistics Advocating the Research Program Strategy. Krefeld-Schwalb A; Witte EH; Zenker F Front Psychol; 2018; 9():460. PubMed ID: 29740363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the Coefficient of Confidence to Make the Philosophical Switch From A Posteriori to A Priori Inferential Statistics. Trafimow D Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Oct; 77(5):831-854. PubMed ID: 29795934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters. Grzybowski A; Mianowany M Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decision qualities of Bayes factor and p value-based hypothesis testing. Jeon M; De Boeck P Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):340-360. PubMed ID: 28594227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners. Erickson RA; Rattner BA Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP. Quintana DS; Williams DR BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 18(1):178. PubMed ID: 29879931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing. García-Pérez MA Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Aug; 77(4):631-662. PubMed ID: 30034024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP. Kelter R BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):142. PubMed ID: 32503439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology. Smith RJ Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. P value and the theory of hypothesis testing: an explanation for new researchers. Biau DJ; Jolles BM; Porcher R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 468(3):885-92. PubMed ID: 19921345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods. Hopkins WG; Batterham AM Sports Med; 2016 Oct; 46(10):1563-73. PubMed ID: 26971328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology. McNulty R BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):244. PubMed ID: 36123631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. To P or Not to P: Backing Bayesian Statistics. Buchinsky FJ; Chadha NK Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 157(6):915-918. PubMed ID: 29192853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem. Smith RJ Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reverse-Bayes methods for evidence assessment and research synthesis. Held L; Matthews R; Ott M; Pawel S Res Synth Methods; 2022 May; 13(3):295-314. PubMed ID: 34889058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deciding on Null Hypotheses using P-values or Bayesian alternatives: A simulation study. Ruiz-Ruano García AM; López Puga J Psicothema; 2018 Feb; 30(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 29363479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayes factor and posterior probability: Complementary statistical evidence to p-value. Lin R; Yin G Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Sep; 44():33-35. PubMed ID: 26212520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Schönbrodt FD; Wagenmakers EJ; Zehetleitner M; Perugini M Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):322-339. PubMed ID: 26651986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]