These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28649414)

  • 21. Characterization of biofouling in a lab-scale forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FOMBR).
    Zhang Q; Jie YW; Loong WL; Zhang J; Fane AG; Kjelleberg S; Rice SA; McDougald D
    Water Res; 2014 Jul; 58():141-51. PubMed ID: 24751548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
    Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biological support media influence the bacterial biofouling community in reverse osmosis water reclamation demonstration plants.
    Ferrera I; Mas J; Taberna E; Sanz J; Sánchez O
    Biofouling; 2015; 31(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 25706000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of antiscalants on biofouling of RO membranes in seawater desalination.
    Sweity A; Oren Y; Ronen Z; Herzberg M
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3389-98. PubMed ID: 23615335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Architecture, component, and microbiome of biofilm involved in the fouling of membrane bioreactors.
    Inaba T; Hori T; Aizawa H; Ogata A; Habe H
    NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes; 2017; 3():5. PubMed ID: 28649406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Community structure of microbial biofilms associated with membrane-based water purification processes as revealed using a polyphasic approach.
    Chen CL; Liu WT; Chong ML; Wong MT; Ong SL; Seah H; Ng WJ
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2004 Jan; 63(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 12682791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biofouling control by quorum sensing inhibition and its dependence on membrane surface.
    Kim M; Lee S; Park HD; Choi SI; Hong S
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(7):1424-30. PubMed ID: 22864426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of conventional chemical treatment on the microbial population in a biofouling layer of reverse osmosis systems.
    Bereschenko LA; Prummel H; Euverink GJ; Stams AJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):405-16. PubMed ID: 21111441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biofouling potential reductions using a membrane hybrid system as a pre-treatment to seawater reverse osmosis.
    Jeong S; Kim LH; Kim SJ; Nguyen TV; Vigneswaran S; Kim IS
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2012 Jul; 167(6):1716-27. PubMed ID: 22238012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biofouling of ultrafiltration membrane by dairy fluids: Characterization of pioneer colonizer bacteria using a DNA metabarcoding approach.
    Chamberland J; Lessard MH; Doyen A; Labrie S; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Feb; 100(2):981-990. PubMed ID: 27889129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Isolation and characterization of
    de Vries HJ; Beyer F; Jarzembowska M; Lipińska J; van den Brink P; Zwijnenburg A; Timmers PHA; Stams AJM; Plugge CM
    NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes; 2019; 5(1):6. PubMed ID: 30701078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges.
    Greenlee LF; Lawler DF; Freeman BD; Marrot B; Moulin P
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2317-48. PubMed ID: 19371922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Autopsy of Used Reverse Osmosis Membranes from the Largest Seawater Desalination Plant in Oman.
    Al-Abri M; Kyaw HH; Al-Ghafri B; Myint MTZ; Dobretsov S
    Membranes (Basel); 2022 Jun; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35877874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Kinetic development of biofilm on NF membranes at the Méry-sur-Oise plant, France.
    Houari A; Seyer D; Kecili K; Heim V; Martino PD
    Biofouling; 2013; 29(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 23320545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An autopsy study of a fouled reverse osmosis membrane element used in a brackish water treatment plant.
    Tran T; Bolto B; Gray S; Hoang M; Ostarcevic E
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3915-23. PubMed ID: 17617435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In situ formation of silver nanoparticles on thin-film composite reverse osmosis membranes for biofouling mitigation.
    Ben-Sasson M; Lu X; Bar-Zeev E; Zodrow KR; Nejati S; Qi G; Giannelis EP; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2014 Oct; 62():260-70. PubMed ID: 24963888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A physical impact of organic fouling layers on bacterial adhesion during nanofiltration.
    Heffernan R; Habimana O; Semião AJ; Cao H; Safari A; Casey E
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():118-28. PubMed ID: 25265304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.