264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28649722)
1. Comparison of DVH-based plan verification methods for VMAT: ArcCHECK-3DVH system and dynalog-based dose reconstruction.
Saito M; Kadoya N; Sato K; Ito K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Onishi H; Jingu K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 18(4):206-214. PubMed ID: 28649722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial experience of ArcCHECK and 3DVH software for RapidArc treatment plan verification.
Infusino E; Mameli A; Conti R; Gaudino D; Stimato G; Bellesi L; D'Angelillo RM; Ramella S; Benassi M; Trodella L
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 25088815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. VMAT QA: measurement-guided 4D dose reconstruction on a patient.
Nelms BE; Opp D; Robinson J; Wolf TK; Zhang G; Moros E; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4228-38. PubMed ID: 22830756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of one algorithm used to modify a planned DVH with data from actual dose delivery.
Ma T; Podgorsak MB; Kumaraswamy LK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):273-282. PubMed ID: 27685140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing measurement-derived (3DVH) and machine log file-derived dose reconstruction methods for VMAT QA in patient geometries.
Tyagi N; Yang K; Yan D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4645. PubMed ID: 25207396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 3-dimensional dose reconstruction system between fluence-based system and dose measurement-guided system.
Nakaguchi Y; Ono T; Onitsuka R; Maruyama M; Shimohigashi Y; Kai Y
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 27179708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of patient DVH-based QA metrics for prostate VMAT: correlation between accuracy of estimated 3D patient dose and magnitude of MLC misalignment.
Kadoya N; Saito M; Ogasawara M; Fujita Y; Ito K; Sato K; Kishi K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Jingu K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5251. PubMed ID: 26103486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DVH analysis using a transmission detector and model-based dose verification system as a comprehensive pretreatment QA tool for VMAT plans: Clinical experience and results.
Mohamed Yoosuf AB; AlShehri S; Alhadab A; Alqathami M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):80-87. PubMed ID: 31605456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-validation of two commercial methods for volumetric high-resolution dose reconstruction on a phantom for non-coplanar VMAT beams.
Feygelman V; Stambaugh C; Opp D; Zhang G; Moros EG; Nelms BE
Radiother Oncol; 2014 Mar; 110(3):558-61. PubMed ID: 24440044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between gamma index passing rate and clinical dosimetric difference for pre-treatment 2D and 3D volumetric modulated arc therapy dosimetric verification.
Jin X; Yan H; Han C; Zhou Y; Yi J; Xie C
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140577. PubMed ID: 25494412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.
Lin MH; Koren S; Veltchev I; Li J; Wang L; Price RA; Ma CM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):3929. PubMed ID: 23470927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment verification using Varian's dynalog files in the Monte Carlo system PRIMO.
Rodriguez M; Brualla L
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 14(1):67. PubMed ID: 31014356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine Log File and Calibration Errors-based Patient-specific Quality Assurance (QA) for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT).
Ma Y; Mou X; Beeraka NM; Guo Y; Liu J; Dai J; Fan R
Curr Pharm Des; 2023; 29(34):2738-2751. PubMed ID: 37916622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram.
Stasi M; Bresciani S; Miranti A; Maggio A; Sapino V; Gabriele P
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7626-34. PubMed ID: 23231310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a novel dose QA tool to quantify the impact of systematic errors otherwise undetected by conventional QA methods: clinical head and neck case studies.
Chan MF; Li J; Schupak K; Burman C
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Feb; 13(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 23819494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D DVH-based metric analysis versus per-beam planar analysis in IMRT pretreatment verification.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Latorre A; Eudaldo T; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5040-9. PubMed ID: 22894429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
