These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28650352)

  • 21. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How repetition influences speech understanding by younger, middle-aged and older adults.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL; Merchant GR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):695-702. PubMed ID: 29801416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lexical influences on competing speech perception in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.
    Helfer KS; Jesse A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):363-76. PubMed ID: 26233036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.
    Stanley N; Davis T; Estis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28277212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech-in-noise representation in the aging midbrain and cortex: Effects of hearing loss.
    Presacco A; Simon JZ; Anderson S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213899. PubMed ID: 30865718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Age-Related Differences in the Effects of Masker Cuing on Releasing Chinese Speech From Informational Masking.
    Feng T; Chen Q; Xiao Z
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1922. PubMed ID: 30356784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Masked Speech Recognition and Reading Ability in School-Age Children: Is There a Relationship?
    Miller G; Lewis B; Benchek P; Buss E; Calandruccio L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):776-788. PubMed ID: 29507949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Age and measurement time-of-day effects on speech recognition in noise.
    Veneman CE; Gordon-Salant S; Matthews LJ; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):288-99. PubMed ID: 23187606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.
    Hall JW; Grose JH; Buss E; Dev MB
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 11951851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
    Buss E; Calandruccio L; Oleson J; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time course and cost of misdirecting auditory spatial attention in younger and older adults.
    Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):711-21. PubMed ID: 24165300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Psychometric function slope for speech-in-noise and speech-in-speech: Effects of development and aging.
    Sobon KA; Taleb NM; Buss E; Grose JH; Calandruccio L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):EL284. PubMed ID: 31046371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mutual information analysis of neural representations of speech in noise in the aging midbrain.
    Zan P; Presacco A; Anderson S; Simon JZ
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Dec; 122(6):2372-2387. PubMed ID: 31596649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Clear-Speech Benefit for School-Age Children: Speech-in-Noise and Speech-in-Speech Recognition.
    Calandruccio L; Porter HL; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):4265-4276. PubMed ID: 33151767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.