167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28650587)
1. The value of N staging with the positive lymph node ratio, and splenectomy, for remnant gastric cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.
Son SY; Kong SH; Ahn HS; Park YS; Ahn SH; Suh YS; Park DJ; Lee HJ; Kim HH; Yang HK
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 116(7):884-893. PubMed ID: 28650587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Pathological staging criteria for carcinoma in the remnant stomach: an exploratory study].
Gao Z; Zhao X; Jiang K; Wang B; Li Y; Ye Y; Wang S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):514-521. PubMed ID: 29774932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Staging for Remnant Gastric Cancer: The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio vs. the UICC 7th Edition System.
Nakagawa M; Choi YY; An JY; Hong JH; Kim JW; Kim HI; Cheong JH; Hyung WJ; Choi SH; Noh SH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(13):4322-4331. PubMed ID: 27370654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Optimal Lymph Node Dissection in Remnant Gastric Cancer Based on Initial Distal Gastrectomy.
Iguchi K; Kunisaki C; Sato S; Tanaka Y; Miyamoto H; Kosaka T; Akiyama H; Endo I; Rino Y; Masuda M
Anticancer Res; 2018 Mar; 38(3):1677-1683. PubMed ID: 29491102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Analyses of surgical treatment and prognosis in gastric stump cancer].
Han FH; Zhan WH; Li YM; He YL; Peng JS; Cai SR; Ma JP; Wang Z
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 12(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19145499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Study on the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic difference of gastric stump cancer between non-anastomotic site and anastomotic site].
Chen L; Wei S; Ye Z; Wang Y; Zheng Q; Zhuo C; Xiao J; Zeng Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 20(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 28105623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of long-term results of radical gastrectomy combining splenectomy for gastric cancer].
Han FH; Zhan WH; Li YM; He YL; Peng JS; Ma JP; Wang Z; Chen ZX; Zheng ZQ; Wang JP; Huang YH; Dong WG
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Sep; 43(17):1114-7. PubMed ID: 16194307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences of the lymphatic distribution and surgical outcomes between remnant gastric cancers and primary proximal gastric cancers.
Komatsu S; Ichikawa D; Okamoto K; Ikoma D; Tsujiura M; Shiozaki A; Fujiwara H; Murayama Y; Kuriu Y; Ikoma H; Nakanishi M; Ochiai T; Kokuba Y; Otsuji E
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Mar; 16(3):503-8. PubMed ID: 22215245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio as an additional tool to the TNM stage system in gastric cancer.
Wu XJ; Miao RL; Li ZY; Bu ZD; Zhang LH; Wu AW; Zong XL; Li SX; Shan F; Ji X; Ren H; Ji JF
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):927-33. PubMed ID: 25913059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Risk factor analysis and prediction model establishment of lymph node metastasis in remnant gastric cancer].
Wang W; Nie R; Zhou Z
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):541-545. PubMed ID: 29774936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Splenic hilar lymph node metastasis independently predicts poor survival for patients with gastric cancers in the upper and/or the middle third of the stomach.
Zhu GL; Sun Z; Wang ZN; Xu YY; Huang BJ; Xu Y; Zhu Z; Xu HM
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):786-92. PubMed ID: 22105768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of the prognostic value of UICC and JGCA lymph node staging criteria for gastric cancer].
Pan Y; Liang H; Xue Q; Zhang RP; Cui QH; Liu N; Wang BG
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 May; 30(5):376-80. PubMed ID: 18953840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive lymph node ratio is an index in predicting prognosis for remnant gastric cancer with insufficient retrieved lymph node in R0 resection.
Wang H; Qi H; Liu X; Gao Z; Hidasa I; Aikebaier A; Li K
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2022. PubMed ID: 33479327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Meta-analysis of gastric stump cancer after gastrectomy for gastric cancer].
Li Y; Gao Z; Zhao X; Wang B; Ye Y; Wang S; Jiang K
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):569-577. PubMed ID: 29774941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal extent of lymph node dissection for remnant advanced gastric carcinoma after distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of more than 3000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.
Katai H; Ishikawa T; Akazawa K; Fukagawa T; Isobe Y; Miyashiro I; Oda I; Tsujitani S; Ono H; Tanabe S; Nunobe S; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y;
Gastric Cancer; 2020 Nov; 23(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 32419120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Metastasis rates of lymph nodes and distribution in advanced gastric cancer and its clinical significance].
Nzengue JC; Zhan WH; Wang JP; Dong WG; Lan P; He YL; Chen ZX; Cai SR
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 9(6):506-9. PubMed ID: 17143796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Progression of remnant gastric cancer is associated with duration of follow-up following distal gastrectomy.
Komatsu S; Ichikawa D; Okamoto K; Ikoma D; Tsujiura M; Nishimura Y; Murayama Y; Shiozaki A; Ikoma H; Kuriu Y; Nakanishi M; Fujiwara H; Ochiai T; Kokuba Y; Otsuji E
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jun; 18(22):2832-6. PubMed ID: 22719193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?
Biondi A; D'Ugo D; Cananzi FC; Papa V; Borasi A; Sicoli F; Degiuli M; Doglietto G; Persiani R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):779-86. PubMed ID: 25899981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of lymph node dissection and splenectomy in node-positive gastric carcinoma.
Adachi Y; Kamakura T; Mori M; Maehara Y; Sugimachi K
Surgery; 1994 Nov; 116(5):837-41. PubMed ID: 7940186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
