220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28651255)
1. Visual Cues Contribute Differentially to Audiovisual Perception of Consonants and Vowels in Improving Recognition and Reducing Cognitive Demands in Listeners With Hearing Impairment Using Hearing Aids.
Moradi S; Lidestam B; Danielsson H; Ng EHN; Rönnberg J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2687-2703. PubMed ID: 28651255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Gated Audiovisual Speech Identification in Elderly Hearing Aid Users and Elderly Normal-Hearing Individuals: Effects of Adding Visual Cues to Auditory Speech Stimuli.
Moradi S; Lidestam B; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gated auditory speech perception in elderly hearing aid users and elderly normal-hearing individuals: effects of hearing impairment and cognitive capacity.
Moradi S; Lidestam B; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Jul; 18():. PubMed ID: 25085610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognition of asynchronous auditory-visual speech by younger and older listeners: A preliminary study.
Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Willison HM; Freund MS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):151. PubMed ID: 28764460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.
Souza PE; Bishop RD
Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 10613384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual Doping: An Audiovisual Facilitation Effect on Auditory Speech Processing, From Phonetic Feature Extraction to Sentence Identification in Noise.
Moradi S; Lidestam B; Ning Ng EH; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):312-327. PubMed ID: 29870521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.
Fogerty D; Bologna WJ; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1133. PubMed ID: 28253707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words.
Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Cohen JI
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):884-97. PubMed ID: 25698021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Working Memory and Speech Recognition in Noise Under Ecologically Relevant Listening Conditions: Effects of Visual Cues and Noise Type Among Adults With Hearing Loss.
Miller CW; Stewart EK; Wu YH; Bishop C; Bentler RA; Tremblay K
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 60(8):2310-2320. PubMed ID: 28744550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of hearing loss on utilization of short-duration spectral cues in stop consonant recognition.
Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jun; 81(6):1940-7. PubMed ID: 3611514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory pattern perception in the profoundly hearing impaired and lipreading of Dutch phonemes.
van Son N; Bosman AJ; Lamoré PJ; Smoorenburg GF
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():111-23. PubMed ID: 8153557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory, visual and audiovisual perception of segmental speech features by severely hearing-impaired children.
Lamoré PJ; Huiskamp TM; van Son NJ; Bosman AJ; Smoorenburg GF
Audiology; 1998; 37(6):396-419. PubMed ID: 9888195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.
Brennan MA; Lewis D; McCreery R; Kopun J; Alexander JM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):823-837. PubMed ID: 28972471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
