These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28651536)

  • 1. Genomic selection for crossbred performance accounting for breed-specific effects.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; Hidalgo AM; van Arendonk JAM; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JWM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):51. PubMed ID: 28651536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic evaluation for a three-way crossbreeding system considering breed-of-origin of alleles.
    Sevillano CA; Vandenplas J; Bastiaansen JWM; Bergsma R; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Oct; 49(1):75. PubMed ID: 29061123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
    Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
    Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of alleles in crossbred pigs estimated for genomic prediction depend on their breed-of-origin.
    Sevillano CA; Ten Napel J; Guimarães SEF; Silva FF; Calus MPL
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Oct; 19(1):740. PubMed ID: 30305017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical determination of breed-of-origin of alleles in three-breed cross pigs.
    Sevillano CA; Vandenplas J; Bastiaansen JW; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):55. PubMed ID: 27491547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
    Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
    Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
    Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 19749023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local breed proportions and local breed heterozygosity in genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cows.
    Eiríksson JH; Strandén I; Su G; Mäntysaari EA; Christensen OF
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Nov; 105(12):9822-9836. PubMed ID: 36307242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
    Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic prediction using a reference population of multiple pure breeds and admixed individuals.
    Karaman E; Su G; Croue I; Lund MS
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 May; 53(1):46. PubMed ID: 34058971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance.
    Ibánez-Escriche N; Fernando RL; Toosi A; Dekkers JC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Jan; 41(1):12. PubMed ID: 19284703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels.
    Xiang T; Ma P; Ostersen T; Legarra A; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jun; 47(1):54. PubMed ID: 26122927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
    Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.