BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28651567)

  • 1. Benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening - predictions of the ONCOTYROL prostate cancer outcome and policy model.
    Mühlberger N; Boskovic K; Krahn MD; Bremner KE; Oberaigner W; Klocker H; Horninger W; Sroczynski G; Siebert U
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):596. PubMed ID: 28651567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ONCOTYROL Prostate Cancer Outcome and Policy Model: Effect of Prevalence Assumptions on the Benefit-Harm Balance of Screening.
    Mühlberger N; Kurzthaler C; Iskandar R; Krahn MD; Bremner KE; Oberaigner W; Klocker H; Horninger W; Conrads-Frank A; Sroczynski G; Siebert U
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Aug; 35(6):758-72. PubMed ID: 25977360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term Results of Active Surveillance in the Göteborg Randomized, Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.
    Godtman RA; Holmberg E; Khatami A; Pihl CG; Stranne J; Hugosson J
    Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):760-766. PubMed ID: 27090975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Active surveillance compared with initial treatment for men with low-risk prostate cancer: a decision analysis.
    Hayes JH; Ollendorf DA; Pearson SD; Barry MJ; Kantoff PW; Stewart ST; Bhatnagar V; Sweeney CJ; Stahl JE; McMahon PM
    JAMA; 2010 Dec; 304(21):2373-80. PubMed ID: 21119084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimizing active surveillance strategies to balance the competing goals of early detection of grade progression and minimizing harm from biopsies.
    Barnett CL; Auffenberg GB; Cheng Z; Yang F; Wang J; Wei JT; Miller DC; Montie JE; Mamawala M; Denton BT
    Cancer; 2018 Feb; 124(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 29131319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Calculator for Prostate Cancer Risk 4 Years After an Initially Negative Screen: Findings from ERSPC Rotterdam.
    Roobol MJ; Zhu X; Schröder FH; van Leenders GJ; van Schaik RH; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW
    Eur Urol; 2013 Apr; 63(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 22841675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the individual benefit of immediate treatment or active surveillance for prostate cancer after screen-detection in older (65+) men.
    de Carvalho TM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2016 May; 138(10):2522-8. PubMed ID: 26695380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for prostate cancer. A decision analytic view.
    Krahn MD; Mahoney JE; Eckman MH; Trachtenberg J; Pauker SG; Detsky AS
    JAMA; 1994 Sep; 272(10):773-80. PubMed ID: 7521400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a simulation study based on ERSPC data.
    Heijnsdijk EA; de Carvalho TM; Auvinen A; Zappa M; Nelen V; Kwiatkowski M; Villers A; Páez A; Moss SM; Tammela TL; Recker F; Denis L; Carlsson SV; Wever EM; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ; Hugosson J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jan; 107(1):366. PubMed ID: 25505238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
    Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the risks and benefits of active surveillance protocols for prostate cancer: a microsimulation study.
    de Carvalho TM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):560-566. PubMed ID: 27222299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Active surveillance of very-low-risk prostate cancer in the setting of active treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with 5α-reductase inhibitors.
    Shelton PQ; Ivanowicz AN; Wakeman CM; Rydberg MG; Norton J; Riggs SB; Teigland CM
    Urology; 2013 May; 81(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 23523297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the harms and benefits of prostate cancer screening as used in common practice versus recommended good practice: A microsimulation screening analysis.
    Carlsson SV; de Carvalho TM; Roobol MJ; Hugosson J; Auvinen A; Kwiatkowski M; Villers A; Zappa M; Nelen V; Páez A; Eastham JA; Lilja H; de Koning HJ; Vickers AJ; Heijnsdijk EA
    Cancer; 2016 Nov; 122(21):3386-3393. PubMed ID: 27459245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study.
    Callender T; Emberton M; Morris S; Eeles R; Kote-Jarai Z; Pharoah PDP; Pashayan N
    PLoS Med; 2019 Dec; 16(12):e1002998. PubMed ID: 31860675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of interscreening interval and age on prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen.
    Wu GH; Auvinen A; Yen AM; Hakama M; Tammela TL; Stenman UH; Kujala P; Ruutu M; Chen HH
    Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):1011-8. PubMed ID: 22264679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefit, Harm, and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Biopsy in Age-based and Risk-stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer.
    Callender T; Emberton M; Morris S; Pharoah PDP; Pashayan N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e2037657. PubMed ID: 33704474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histological inflammation and risk of subsequent prostate cancer among men with initially elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.
    Yli-Hemminki TH; Laurila M; Auvinen A; Määttänen L; Huhtala H; Tammela TL; Kujala PM
    BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 23746332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate cancer diagnosis among men with isolated high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia enrolled onto a 3-year prospective phase III clinical trial of oral toremifene.
    Taneja SS; Morton R; Barnette G; Sieber P; Hancock ML; Steiner M
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 23295793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.
    Mandelblatt JS; Stout NK; Schechter CB; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Krapcho M; Trentham-Dietz A; Munoz D; Lee SJ; Berry DA; van Ravesteyn NT; Alagoz O; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Near AM; Hoeffken A; Chang Y; Heijnsdijk EA; Chisholm G; Huang X; Huang H; Ergun MA; Gangnon R; Sprague BL; Plevritis S; Feuer E; de Koning HJ; Cronin KA
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26756606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.