These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28653808)

  • 1. A novel technique for reference point generation to aid in intraoral scan alignment.
    Renne WG; Evans ZP; Mennito A; Ludlow M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Nov; 29(6):391-395. PubMed ID: 28653808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation.
    Monaco C; Ragazzini N; Scheda L; Evangelisti E
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):383-385. PubMed ID: 29191608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study.
    Zhongpeng Y; Tianmin X; Ruoping J
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 31029133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smile design and advanced provisional fabrication.
    Malone M
    Gen Dent; 2008 May; 56(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 19288831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing.
    Wesemann C; Muallah J; Mah J; Bumann A
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 27834416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In silico comparison of the reproducibility of full-arch implant provisional restorations to final restoration between a 3D Scan/CAD/CAM technique and the conventional method.
    Mino T; Maekawa K; Ueda A; Higuchi S; Sejima J; Takeuchi T; Hara ES; Kimura-Ono A; Sonoyama W; Kuboki T
    J Prosthodont Res; 2015 Apr; 59(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 25623362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant Digital Impression in the Esthetic Area.
    Monaco C; Scheda L; Baldissara P; Zucchelli G
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):536-540. PubMed ID: 30357992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fully digital approach to replicate peri-implant soft tissue contours and emergence profile in the esthetic zone.
    Monaco C; Evangelisti E; Scotti R; Mignani G; Zucchelli G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1511-1514. PubMed ID: 25907030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Workflow description of additively manufactured clear silicone indexes for injected provisional restorations: A novel technique.
    Revilla-León M; Fountain J; Piedra Cascón W; Özcan M; Zandinejad A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 May; 31(3):213-221. PubMed ID: 30829449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary full-arch reconstruction using a sequenced digital workflow.
    Roberts M; Shull F; Schiner B
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):336-356. PubMed ID: 32424888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and conventional impression method for craniomaxillofacial defects using a software analysis.
    Beri A; Pisulkar SK; Bagde AD; Bansod A; Dahihandekar C; Paikrao B
    Trials; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1048. PubMed ID: 36575547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital cross-mounting: A new opportunity in prosthetic dentistry.
    Venezia P; Torsello F; D'Amato S; Cavalcanti R
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(9):701-709. PubMed ID: 28849806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
    Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital transfer of the subgingival contour and emergence profile of the provisional restoration to the final bone-anchored fixed restoration.
    Kurosaki Y; Mino T; Maekawa K; Izumi K; Kuboki T
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):125-129. PubMed ID: 30455114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - part I: 3D printed and milled palatal stimulation plate for trisomy 21.
    Xepapadeas AB; Weise C; Frank K; Spintzyk S; Poets CF; Wiechers C; Arand J; Koos B
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 31973720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data.
    Chen Z; Li Y; Deng X; Wang X
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24118182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of scan substrates on accuracy of 7 intraoral digital impression systems using human maxilla model.
    Bocklet C; Renne W; Mennito A; Bacro T; Latham J; Evans Z; Ludlow M; Kelly A; Nash J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 May; 22 Suppl 1():168-174. PubMed ID: 31074138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.