These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28654965)

  • 1. Mid-level perceptual features contain early cues to animacy.
    Long B; Störmer VS; Alvarez GA
    J Vis; 2017 Jun; 17(6):20. PubMed ID: 28654965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mid-level visual features underlie the high-level categorical organization of the ventral stream.
    Long B; Yu CP; Konkle T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(38):E9015-E9024. PubMed ID: 30171168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A familiar-size Stroop effect in the absence of basic-level recognition.
    Long B; Konkle T
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():234-242. PubMed ID: 28732302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Ventral Visual Pathway Represents Animal Appearance over Animacy, Unlike Human Behavior and Deep Neural Networks.
    Bracci S; Ritchie JB; Kalfas I; Op de Beeck HP
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(33):6513-6525. PubMed ID: 31196934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disentangling Representations of Object Shape and Object Category in Human Visual Cortex: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction.
    Proklova D; Kaiser D; Peelen MV
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 May; 28(5):680-92. PubMed ID: 26765944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MEG sensor patterns reflect perceptual but not categorical similarity of animate and inanimate objects.
    Proklova D; Kaiser D; Peelen MV
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jun; 193():167-177. PubMed ID: 30885785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mid-level perceptual features distinguish objects of different real-world sizes.
    Long B; Konkle T; Cohen MA; Alvarez GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jan; 145(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 26709591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Untangling featural and conceptual object representations.
    Grootswagers T; Robinson AK; Shatek SM; Carlson TA
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116083. PubMed ID: 31400529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Animacy, perceptual load, and inattentional blindness.
    Calvillo DP; Jackson RE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):670-5. PubMed ID: 24197657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mid-level Feature Differences Support Early Animacy and Object Size Distinctions: Evidence from Electroencephalography Decoding.
    Wang R; Janini D; Konkle T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 34(9):1670-1680. PubMed ID: 35704550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bottom-up processing of curvilinear visual features is sufficient for animate/inanimate object categorization.
    Zachariou V; Del Giacco AC; Ungerleider LG; Yue X
    J Vis; 2018 Nov; 18(12):3. PubMed ID: 30458511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual animacy: visual search for chasing objects among distractors.
    Meyerhoff HS; Schwan S; Huff M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):702-17. PubMed ID: 24294872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Category selectivity for animals and man-made objects: Beyond low- and mid-level visual features.
    He C; Cheung OS
    J Vis; 2019 Oct; 19(12):22. PubMed ID: 31648308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: Evidence for task-independent category effects.
    Wiggett AJ; Pritchard IC; Downing PE
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3111-7. PubMed ID: 19631673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contributions of early and mid-level visual cortex to high-level object categorization.
    Kramer LE; Chen YC; Long B; Konkle T; Cohen MR
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37398251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neutral animals matter: Animacy modulates object-based attentional allocation.
    Hu S; Yang T; Zhang H; Gao Y; Zhao J; Wang Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Mar; 76(3):583-595. PubMed ID: 35400222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search.
    Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):902-12. PubMed ID: 25321485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceiving animacy purely from visual motion cues involves intraparietal sulcus.
    Schultz J; Bülthoff HH
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():120-132. PubMed ID: 31028922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reward Selectively Modulates the Lingering Neural Representation of Recently Attended Objects in Natural Scenes.
    Hickey C; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(31):7297-7304. PubMed ID: 28630254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive memory: animacy processing produces mnemonic advantages.
    VanArsdall JE; Nairne JS; Pandeirada JN; Blunt JR
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23261948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.