These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28655038)

  • 1. Kinematic Analysis of Speech Sound Sequencing Errors Induced by Delayed Auditory Feedback.
    Cler GJ; Lee JC; Mittelman T; Stepp CE; Bohland JW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 60(6S):1695-1711. PubMed ID: 28655038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delayed Auditory Feedback Elicits Specific Patterns of Serial Order Errors in a Paced Syllable Sequence Production Task.
    Malloy JR; Nistal D; Heyne M; Tardif MC; Bohland JW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 May; 65(5):1800-1821. PubMed ID: 35442719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid change in articulatory lip movement induced by preceding auditory feedback during production of bilabial plosives.
    Mochida T; Gomi H; Kashino M
    PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13866. PubMed ID: 21079783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Auditory Information on Patterns of Intrusions and Reductions.
    Slis A; van Lieshout P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):430-45. PubMed ID: 27232422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compensations to auditory feedback perturbations in congenitally blind and sighted speakers: Acoustic and articulatory data.
    Trudeau-Fisette P; Tiede M; Ménard L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180300. PubMed ID: 28678819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compensation for a lip-tube perturbation in 4-year-olds: Articulatory, acoustic, and perceptual data analyzed in comparison with adults.
    Ménard L; Perrier P; Aubin J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2514. PubMed ID: 27250147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speakers are able to categorize vowels based on tongue somatosensation.
    Patri JF; Ostry DJ; Diard J; Schwartz JL; Trudeau-Fisette P; Savariaux C; Perrier P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(11):6255-6263. PubMed ID: 32123070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Vocal Effort on Respiratory and Articulatory Kinematics.
    Abur D; Perkell JS; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 34843405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deficit or Difference? Effects of Altered Auditory Feedback on Speech Fluency and Kinematic Variability in Adults Who Stutter.
    Chon H; Jackson ES; Kraft SJ; Ambrose NG; Loucks TM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 64(7):2539-2556. PubMed ID: 34153192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Focal manipulations of formant trajectories reveal a role of auditory feedback in the online control of both within-syllable and between-syllable speech timing.
    Cai S; Ghosh SS; Guenther FH; Perkell JS
    J Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 31(45):16483-90. PubMed ID: 22072698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic consequences of articulatory variability during productions of /t/ and /k/ and its implications for speech error research.
    Marin S; Pouplier M; Harrington J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):445-61. PubMed ID: 20058990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of delayed auditory feedback on speech kinematics in fluent speakers.
    Sasisekaran J
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Dec; 115(3):845-64. PubMed ID: 23409597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tongue and Lower Lip Movement in Semivowel /w/ Production.
    Lee J; Pond AL; Sincavage J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2016; 68(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 27453992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rhythmic versus phonemic interference in delayed auditory feedback.
    Kaspar K; Rübeling H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):932-43. PubMed ID: 20966383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of blindness on production-perception relationships: Compensation strategies for a lip-tube perturbation of the French [u].
    Ménard L; Turgeon C; Trudeau-Fisette P; Bellavance-Courtemanche M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2016; 30(3-5):227-48. PubMed ID: 26403592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing Ecologically Valid Methods of Auditory Feedback Measurement in Individuals With Typical Speech.
    Tomassi NE; Weerathunge HR; Cushman MR; Bohland JW; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):121-135. PubMed ID: 34941381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual variability in delayed auditory feedback effects on speech fluency and rate in normally fluent adults.
    Chon H; Kraft SJ; Zhang J; Loucks T; Ambrose NG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):489-504. PubMed ID: 22992711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lip kinematics for /p/ and /b/ production during whispered and voiced speech.
    Higashikawa M; Green JR; Moore CA; Minifie FD
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 12566763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Articulatory-acoustic kinematics: the production of American English /s/.
    Iskarous K; Shadle CH; Proctor MI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):944-54. PubMed ID: 21361451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Articulatory and acoustic adaptation to palatal perturbation.
    Thibeault M; Ménard L; Baum SR; Richard G; McFarland DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2112-20. PubMed ID: 21476667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.