These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2865506)

  • 1. The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Lancet; 1985 Nov; 2(8462):987. PubMed ID: 2865506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Effects on the lower esophageal sphincter of primates.
    Benjamin SB; Knuff TK; Fink M; Woods E; Castell DO
    Ann Surg; 1983 Jan; 197(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 6848055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux: symptomatic and objective assessment.
    Weaver RM; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 4051424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Appraisal of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis based on clinical and manometric data and pH monitoring.
    de Caestecker JS; Ross HM; Heading RC; Macleod IB
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1989 Feb; 34(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 2709364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Angelchik prosthesis--intermediate term evaluation and results].
    Siewert JR; Feussner H
    Z Gastroenterol; 1988 Aug; 26(8):421-9. PubMed ID: 3064455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimal access surgery for gastroesophageal reflux: laparoscopic placement of the Angelchik prosthesis in pigs.
    Berguer R; Stiegmann GV; Yamamoto M; Kim J; Mansour A; Denton J; Norton LW; Angelchik JP
    Surg Endosc; 1991; 5(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 1837188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Angelchik prosthesis--results and complications.
    Jamieson GG
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1987 Sep; 57(9):591. PubMed ID: 3689245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical effect of the Angelchik prosthesis on the competency of the gastric cardia: pathophysiologic implications and surgical perspectives.
    Bonavina L; DeMeester T; Mason R; Stein HJ; Feussner H; Evander A
    Dis Esophagus; 1997 Apr; 10(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 9179481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Angelchik prosthesis.
    Brown HS
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1986 Aug; 42(2):230. PubMed ID: 3741022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Angelchik anti-reflux device: radiographic appearance of complications.
    Curtis DJ; Benjamin SB; Kerr R; Castell DO
    Radiology; 1984 May; 151(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 6424173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An objective long-term evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Evans DF; Robertson CS; Morris DL; Ledingham SJ; Doran J; Hardcastle JD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1991 Nov; 73(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 1759764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The Angelchik prosthesis in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux].
    Myrhøj T; Andersen LI; Boesby S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1989 Mar; 151(10):627-9. PubMed ID: 2922832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective study of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Wale RJ; Royston CM; Bennett JR; Buckton GK
    Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 4016530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lower esophageal sphincter or upper gastric sphincter?
    Castell DO; Katz PO
    Dis Esophagus; 1997 Apr; 10(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 9179482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Angelchik prosthesis: what have we learned in fifteen years?
    Crookes PF; DeMeester TR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1385-6. PubMed ID: 8010777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sonographic appearance of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Konez O; Nazinitsky KJ; Goyal M; Collins RB; Boinapally SN
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2000 Jun; 28(5):254-7. PubMed ID: 10800005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of an adjustable prosthesis for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux: preliminary results in a porcine model.
    Carugno F; Donohue JH; Moreno E; Byrne J; Hodge DO; Ilstrup DM; Sarr MG
    ASAIO J; 1998; 44(3):140-3. PubMed ID: 9617942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Esophageal manometry for the study of gastroesophageal reflux].
    Felix VN
    Arq Gastroenterol; 1988; 25(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 3066306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):69. PubMed ID: 2301909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severe dysphagia from an Angelchik prosthesis: futility of routine esophageal testing.
    Demmy TL; Caron NR; Curtis JJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1660-1. PubMed ID: 8010825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.