298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28655633)
1. Cross-validation failure: Small sample sizes lead to large error bars.
Varoquaux G
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt A):68-77. PubMed ID: 28655633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical inference and multiple testing correction in classification-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA): random permutations and cluster size control.
Stelzer J; Chen Y; Turner R
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():69-82. PubMed ID: 23041526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FReM - Scalable and stable decoding with fast regularized ensemble of models.
Hoyos-Idrobo A; Varoquaux G; Schwartz Y; Thirion B
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt A):160-172. PubMed ID: 29030104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decoding fMRI activity in the time domain improves classification performance.
Loula J; Varoquaux G; Thirion B
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt A):203-210. PubMed ID: 28801250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The significance of streamlined postprocessing approaches for clinical FMRI.
Pillai JJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013; 34(6):1194-6. PubMed ID: 23292528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A method for generating reproducible evidence in fMRI studies.
Liou M; Su HR; Lee JD; Aston JA; Tsai AC; Cheng PE
Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):383-95. PubMed ID: 16226893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of importance extraction methods in neural network based fMRI classification.
Gotsopoulos A; Saarimäki H; Glerean E; Jääskeläinen IP; Sams M; Nummenmaa L; Lampinen J
Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():44-54. PubMed ID: 29964190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-validation and permutations in MVPA: Validity of permutation strategies and power of cross-validation schemes.
Valente G; Castellanos AL; Hausfeld L; De Martino F; Formisano E
Neuroimage; 2021 Sep; 238():118145. PubMed ID: 33961999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fast bootstrapping and permutation testing for assessing reproducibility and interpretability of multivariate fMRI decoding models.
Conroy BR; Walz JM; Sajda P
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79271. PubMed ID: 24244465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Searchlight analysis: promise, pitfalls, and potential.
Etzel JA; Zacks JM; Braver TS
Neuroimage; 2013 Sep; 78():261-9. PubMed ID: 23558106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical power and prediction accuracy in multisite resting-state fMRI connectivity.
Dansereau C; Benhajali Y; Risterucci C; Pich EM; Orban P; Arnold D; Bellec P
Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 149():220-232. PubMed ID: 28161310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic method for tracing regions of interest in rat brain magnetic resonance imaging studies.
Nie B; Hui J; Wang L; Chai P; Gao J; Liu S; Zhang Z; Shan B; Zhao S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Oct; 32(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 20882613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resting-state fMRI data reflects default network activity rather than null data: A defense of commonly employed methods to correct for multiple comparisons.
Slotnick SD
Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 8(3):141-143. PubMed ID: 28002981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brain-decoding fMRI reveals how wholes relate to the sum of parts.
Kubilius J; Baeck A; Wagemans J; Op de Beeck HP
Cortex; 2015 Nov; 72():5-14. PubMed ID: 25771992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensible decoding.
Carlson TA; Wardle SG
Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():217-8. PubMed ID: 25680521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of functional MRI for detection, decoding and high-resolution imaging of the response patterns of cortical columns.
Chaimow D; Uğurbil K; Shmuel A
Neuroimage; 2018 Jan; 164():67-99. PubMed ID: 28461061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mapping reliability in multicenter MRI: voxel-based morphometry and cortical thickness.
Schnack HG; van Haren NE; Brouwer RM; van Baal GC; Picchioni M; Weisbrod M; Sauer H; Cannon TD; Huttunen M; Lepage C; Collins DL; Evans A; Murray RM; Kahn RS; Hulshoff Pol HE
Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Dec; 31(12):1967-82. PubMed ID: 21086550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliable individual differences in fine-grained cortical functional architecture.
Feilong M; Nastase SA; Guntupalli JS; Haxby JV
Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():375-386. PubMed ID: 30118870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates.
Pipitone J; Park MT; Winterburn J; Lett TA; Lerch JP; Pruessner JC; Lepage M; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM;
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():494-512. PubMed ID: 24784800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The quantitative evaluation of functional neuroimaging experiments: the NPAIRS data analysis framework.
Strother SC; Anderson J; Hansen LK; Kjems U; Kustra R; Sidtis J; Frutiger S; Muley S; LaConte S; Rottenberg D
Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):747-71. PubMed ID: 11906218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]