237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28655787)
1. Cytosine Deaminase APOBEC3A Sensitizes Leukemia Cells to Inhibition of the DNA Replication Checkpoint.
Green AM; Budagyan K; Hayer KE; Reed MA; Savani MR; Wertheim GB; Weitzman MD
Cancer Res; 2017 Sep; 77(17):4579-4588. PubMed ID: 28655787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loss of the abasic site sensor HMCES is synthetic lethal with the activity of the APOBEC3A cytosine deaminase in cancer cells.
Biayna J; Garcia-Cao I; Álvarez MM; Salvadores M; Espinosa-Carrasco J; McCullough M; Supek F; Stracker TH
PLoS Biol; 2021 Mar; 19(3):e3001176. PubMed ID: 33788831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. APOBEC3A damages the cellular genome during DNA replication.
Green AM; Landry S; Budagyan K; Avgousti DC; Shalhout S; Bhagwat AS; Weitzman MD
Cell Cycle; 2016; 15(7):998-1008. PubMed ID: 26918916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inhibition of ATR-dependent feedback activation of Chk1 sensitises cancer cells to Chk1 inhibitor monotherapy.
Massey AJ
Cancer Lett; 2016 Dec; 383(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 27693461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Co-Inhibition of the DNA Damage Response and CHK1 Enhances Apoptosis of Neuroblastoma Cells.
Ando K; Nakamura Y; Nagase H; Nakagawara A; Koshinaga T; Wada S; Makishima M
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jul; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 31362335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B Activities Render Cancer Cells Susceptible to ATR Inhibition.
Buisson R; Lawrence MS; Benes CH; Zou L
Cancer Res; 2017 Sep; 77(17):4567-4578. PubMed ID: 28698210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New insights into ATR inhibition in muscle invasive bladder cancer: The role of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic subunit 3B.
Kim H; Cho U; Hong SH; Park HS; Kim IH; An HJ; Shim BY; Kang JH
Oncol Res; 2024; 32(6):1021-1030. PubMed ID: 38827321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. APOBEC3A induces DNA gaps through PRIMPOL and confers gap-associated therapeutic vulnerability.
Kawale AS; Ran X; Patel PS; Saxena S; Lawrence MS; Zou L
Sci Adv; 2024 Jan; 10(3):eadk2771. PubMed ID: 38241374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple DNA damage-dependent and DNA damage-independent stress responses define the outcome of ATR/Chk1 targeting in medulloblastoma cells.
Krüger K; Geist K; Stuhldreier F; Schumacher L; Blümel L; Remke M; Wesselborg S; Stork B; Klöcker N; Bormann S; Roos WP; Honnen S; Fritz G
Cancer Lett; 2018 Aug; 430():34-46. PubMed ID: 29753759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Restored replication fork stabilization, a mechanism of PARP inhibitor resistance, can be overcome by cell cycle checkpoint inhibition.
Haynes B; Murai J; Lee JM
Cancer Treat Rev; 2018 Dec; 71():1-7. PubMed ID: 30269007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Targeting DNA Damage Response in Prostate Cancer by Inhibiting Androgen Receptor-CDC6-ATR-Chk1 Signaling.
Karanika S; Karantanos T; Li L; Wang J; Park S; Yang G; Zuo X; Song JH; Maity SN; Manyam GC; Broom B; Aparicio AM; Gallick GE; Troncoso P; Corn PG; Navone N; Zhang W; Li S; Thompson TC
Cell Rep; 2017 Feb; 18(8):1970-1981. PubMed ID: 28228262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SLFN11 promotes CDT1 degradation by CUL4 in response to replicative DNA damage, while its absence leads to synthetic lethality with ATR/CHK1 inhibitors.
Jo U; Murai Y; Chakka S; Chen L; Cheng K; Murai J; Saha LK; Miller Jenkins LM; Pommier Y
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(6):. PubMed ID: 33536335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of selective checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition on cytarabine cytotoxicity in acute myelogenous leukemia cells in vitro.
Schenk EL; Koh BD; Flatten KS; Peterson KL; Parry D; Hess AD; Smith BD; Karp JE; Karnitz LM; Kaufmann SH
Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Oct; 18(19):5364-73. PubMed ID: 22869869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elevated APOBEC3B expression drives a kataegic-like mutation signature and replication stress-related therapeutic vulnerabilities in p53-defective cells.
Nikkilä J; Kumar R; Campbell J; Brandsma I; Pemberton HN; Wallberg F; Nagy K; Scheer I; Vertessy BG; Serebrenik AA; Monni V; Harris RS; Pettitt SJ; Ashworth A; Lord CJ
Br J Cancer; 2017 Jun; 117(1):113-123. PubMed ID: 28535155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Targeting a non-oncogene addiction to the ATR/CHK1 axis for the treatment of small cell lung cancer.
Doerr F; George J; Schmitt A; Beleggia F; Rehkämper T; Hermann S; Walter V; Weber JP; Thomas RK; Wittersheim M; Büttner R; Persigehl T; Reinhardt HC
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15511. PubMed ID: 29138515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CHK1 and WEE1 inhibition combine synergistically to enhance therapeutic efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia ex vivo.
Chaudhuri L; Vincelette ND; Koh BD; Naylor RM; Flatten KS; Peterson KL; McNally A; Gojo I; Karp JE; Mesa RA; Sproat LO; Bogenberger JM; Kaufmann SH; Tibes R
Haematologica; 2014 Apr; 99(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 24179152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploiting replicative stress in gynecological cancers as a therapeutic strategy.
Ngoi NY; Sundararajan V; Tan DS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1224-1238. PubMed ID: 32571890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential response of normal and malignant urothelial cells to CHK1 and ATM inhibitors.
Wang WT; Catto JW; Meuth M
Oncogene; 2015 May; 34(22):2887-96. PubMed ID: 25043304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanisms responsible for the synergistic antileukemic interactions between ATR inhibition and cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia cells.
Ma J; Li X; Su Y; Zhao J; Luedtke DA; Epshteyn V; Edwards H; Wang G; Wang Z; Chu R; Taub JW; Lin H; Wang Y; Ge Y
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():41950. PubMed ID: 28176818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ATR-CHK1 pathway as a therapeutic target for acute and chronic leukemias.
Boudny M; Trbusek M
Cancer Treat Rev; 2020 Aug; 88():102026. PubMed ID: 32592909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
