BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28656505)

  • 1. Videoexoscopic real-time intraoperative navigation for spinal neurosurgery: a novel co-adaptation of two existing technology platforms, technical note.
    Huang M; Barber SM; Steele WJ; Boghani Z; Desai VR; Britz GW; West GA; Trask TW; Holman PJ
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Jun; 12(2):251-255. PubMed ID: 28656505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of 3D image navigation with a cutaneously fixed dynamic reference frame in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Cho JY; Chan CK; Lee SH; Lee HY
    Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(6):300-9. PubMed ID: 23098190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microsurgical Clipping of an Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm Using a Novel Robotic Visualization Tool in Lieu of the Binocular Operating Microscope: Operative Video.
    Klinger DR; Reinard KA; Ajayi OO; Delashaw JB
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2018 Jan; 14(1):26-28. PubMed ID: 29253287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of navigation-assisted fluoroscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery.
    Kim CW; Lee YP; Taylor W; Oygar A; Kim WK
    Spine J; 2008; 8(4):584-90. PubMed ID: 18586198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Navigation and Robotics in Spinal Surgery: Where Are We Now?
    Overley SC; Cho SK; Mehta AI; Arnold PM
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3S):S86-S99. PubMed ID: 28350944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Navigated placement of iliac bolts: description of a new technique.
    Garrido BJ; Wood KE
    Spine J; 2011 Apr; 11(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 21474085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcomes following spinal fusion using an intraoperative computed tomographic 3D imaging system.
    Xiao R; Miller JA; Sabharwal NC; Lubelski D; Alentado VJ; Healy AT; Mroz TE; Benzel EC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):628-637. PubMed ID: 28291408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design of a robot-assisted system for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar surgeries: study protocol.
    Fan N; Yuan S; Du P; Zhu W; Li L; Hai Y; Ding H; Wang G; Zang L
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Oct; 15(1):479. PubMed ID: 33076965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Future perspectives for intraoperative MRI.
    Jolesz FA
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Jan; 16(1):201-13. PubMed ID: 15561539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic-Assisted Spinal Surgery: Current Generation Instrumentation and New Applications.
    Elswick CM; Strong MJ; Joseph JR; Saadeh Y; Oppenlander M; Park P
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2020 Jan; 31(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 31739920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models.
    Austin MS; Vaccaro AR; Brislin B; Nachwalter R; Hilibrand AS; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2503-8. PubMed ID: 12435982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic Tissue Manipulation and Resection in Spine Surgery.
    Trybula SJ; Oyon DE; Wolinsky JP
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2020 Jan; 31(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 31739922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better Than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
    Tian W; Xu YF; Liu B; Liu YJ; He D; Yuan Q; Lang Z; Han XG
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):237-242. PubMed ID: 28632545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoperative spinal navigation.
    Holly LT; Foley KT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15 Suppl):S54-61. PubMed ID: 12897475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The accuracy of navigation and 3D image-guided placement for the placement of pedicle screws in congenital spine deformity.
    Larson AN; Polly DW; Guidera KJ; Mielke CH; Santos ER; Ledonio CG; Sembrano JN
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32(6):e23-9. PubMed ID: 22892631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted spinal navigation versus serial radiography and operative time for posterior spinal fusion at L5-S1.
    Sasso RC; Garrido BJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 17414979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis.
    Lau D; Terman SW; Patel R; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 23394166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First spine surgery utilizing real-time image-guided robotic assistance.
    Ahmed AK; Zygourakis CC; Kalb S; Zhu AM; Molina CA; Jiang B; Blitz AM; Bydon A; Crawford NR; Theodore N
    Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2019 Dec; 24(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 30821536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing brain tumor resection. Midfield interventional MR imaging.
    Alexander E
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2001 Nov; 11(4):659-72. PubMed ID: 11995421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.