259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28656673)
1. Fourier analysis algorithm for the posterior corneal keratometric data: clinical usefulness in keratoconus.
Sideroudi H; Labiris G; Georgantzoglou K; Ntonti P; Siganos C; Kozobolis V
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):460-466. PubMed ID: 28656673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fourier analysis of videokeratography data: Clinical usefulness in grade I and subclinical keratoconus.
Sideroudi H; Labiris G; Georgatzoglou K; Ditzel F; Siganos C; Kozobolis V
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 May; 42(5):731-7. PubMed ID: 27255250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fourier Analysis on Irregular Corneal Astigmatism Using Optical Coherence Tomography in Various Severity Stages of Keratoconus.
Maeno S; Koh S; Inoue R; Oie Y; Maeda N; Jhanji V; Nishida K
Am J Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 243():55-65. PubMed ID: 35850250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the diagnostic ability of vector parameters characterizing the corneal astigmatism and regularity in clinical and subclinical keratoconus.
Martínez-Abad A; Piñero DP; Ruiz-Fortes P; Artola A
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Apr; 40(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 27931882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal regular and irregular astigmatism assessed by Fourier analysis of videokeratography data in normal and pathologic eyes.
Tanabe T; Tomidokoro A; Samejima T; Miyata K; Sato M; Kaji Y; Oshika T
Ophthalmology; 2004 Apr; 111(4):752-7. PubMed ID: 15051209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal topography in keratoconus evaluated more than 30 years after penetrating keratoplasty: a Fourier harmonic analysis.
Ono T; Kawasaki Y; Chen LW; Toyono T; Shirakawa R; Yoshida J; Aihara M; Miyai T
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):14880. PubMed ID: 32913233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of Fourier analysis of videokeratographic data.
Sideroudi H; Labiris G; Ditzel F; Tsaragli E; Georgatzoglou K; Siganos H; Kozobolis V
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1433-1440. PubMed ID: 28620708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of axial and tangential corneal topography maps in detecting subclinical keratoconus.
Tummanapalli SS; Potluri H; Vaddavalli PK; Sangwan VS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2205-14. PubMed ID: 26703297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam.
Miháltz K; Kovács I; Takács A; Nagy ZZ
Cornea; 2009 Oct; 28(9):976-80. PubMed ID: 19724217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subclinical keratoconus detection by pattern analysis of corneal and epithelial thickness maps with optical coherence tomography.
Li Y; Chamberlain W; Tan O; Brass R; Weiss JL; Huang D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 42(2):284-95. PubMed ID: 27026454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Scheimpflug and swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconus eyes.
Ghoreishi SM; Mortazavi SAA; Abtahi ZA; Abtahi MA; Sonbolestan SA; Abtahi SH; Mohammadinia M; Isfahani KN
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):965-971. PubMed ID: 27671494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in anterior and posterior corneal curvatures in keratoconus.
Tomidokoro A; Oshika T; Amano S; Higaki S; Maeda N; Miyata K
Ophthalmology; 2000 Jul; 107(7):1328-32. PubMed ID: 10889107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in Posterior Corneal Features Between Normal Corneas and Subclinical Keratoconus.
Golan O; Hwang ES; Lang P; Santhiago MR; Abulafia A; Touboul D; Krauthammer M; Smadja D
J Refract Surg; 2018 Oct; 34(10):664-670. PubMed ID: 30296327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.
Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G
Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus.
de Sanctis U; Loiacono C; Richiardi L; Turco D; Mutani B; Grignolo FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Progression of keratoconus assessed by fourier analysis of videokeratography data.
Oshika T; Tanabe T; Tomidokoro A; Amano S
Ophthalmology; 2002 Feb; 109(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 11825821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated keratoconus detection using height data of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces.
Bessho K; Maeda N; Kuroda T; Fujikado T; Tano Y; Oshika T
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2006; 50(5):409-416. PubMed ID: 17013692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel zernike application to differentiate between three-dimensional corneal thickness of normal corneas and corneas with keratoconus.
Shetty R; Matalia H; Srivatsa P; Ghosh A; Dupps WJ; Sinha Roy A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 160(3):453-462.e2. PubMed ID: 26067190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
