384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28657550)
1. Pre-treatment patient-specific stopping power by combining list-mode proton radiography and x-ray CT.
Collins-Fekete CA; Brousmiche S; Hansen DC; Beaulieu L; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):6836-6852. PubMed ID: 28657550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regularised patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on proton radiographic images.
Krah N; Patera V; Rit S; Schiavi A; Rinaldi I
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065008. PubMed ID: 30708365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental comparison of relative stopping power evaluation between proton CT and x-ray CT for pre-clinical proton irradiation studies of small animals.
Terakawa A; Hosokawa H; Nogami M; Hitomi K; Ishii K
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(9):. PubMed ID: 37011626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A maximum likelihood method for high resolution proton radiography/proton CT.
Collins-Fekete CA; Brousmiche S; Portillo SK; Beaulieu L; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(23):8232-8248. PubMed ID: 27811399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography.
Doolan PJ; Testa M; Sharp G; Bentefour EH; Royle G; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(5):1901-17. PubMed ID: 25668437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined influence of CT random noise and HU-RSP calibration curve nonlinearities on proton range systematic errors.
Brousmiche S; Souris K; de Xivry JO; Lee JA; Macq B; Seco J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8226-8245. PubMed ID: 28817383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of beam-hardening corrections on proton relative stopping power estimates from single- and dual-energy CT.
Chacko MS; Wu D; Grewal HS; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13711. PubMed ID: 35816460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of proton stopping power estimation of silicone breast implants with single and dual-energy CT calibration techniques.
Chacko MS; Grewal HS; Wu D; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 22(9):159-170. PubMed ID: 34275175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system.
Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo comparison of x-ray and proton CT for range calculations of proton therapy beams.
Arbor N; Dauvergne D; Dedes G; Létang JM; Parodi K; Quiñones CT; Testa E; Rit S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(19):7585-99. PubMed ID: 26378805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Iterative optimization of relative stopping power by single detector based multi-projection proton radiography.
Zhang R; Sharp GC; Jee KW; Cascio E; Harms J; Flanz JB; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065022. PubMed ID: 30561373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental comparison of proton CT and dual energy x-ray CT for relative stopping power estimation in proton therapy.
Dedes G; Dickmann J; Niepel K; Wesp P; Johnson RP; Pankuch M; Bashkirov V; Rit S; Volz L; Schulte RW; Landry G; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(16):165002. PubMed ID: 31220814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement of single detector proton radiography by incorporating intensity of time-resolved dose rate functions.
Zhang R; Jee KW; Cascio E; Sharp GC; Flanz JB; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015030. PubMed ID: 29116055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison study between single- and dual-energy CT density extraction methods for neurological proton monte carlo treatment planning.
van der Heyden B; Almeida IP; Vilches-Freixas G; Van Beveren C; Vaniqui A; Ares C; Terhaag K; Fonseca GP; Eekers DBP; Verhaegen F
Acta Oncol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 31646923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Water-equivalent path length calibration of a prototype proton CT scanner.
Hurley RF; Schulte RW; Bashkirov VA; Wroe AJ; Ghebremedhin A; Sadrozinski HF; Rykalin V; Coutrakon G; Koss P; Patyal B
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2438-46. PubMed ID: 22559614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical Note: Relative proton stopping power estimation from virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer computed tomography.
Landry G; Dörringer F; Si-Mohamed S; Douek P; Abascal JFPJ; Peyrin F; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F; Rinaldi I; Parodi K; Rit S
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1821-1828. PubMed ID: 30695108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of low-dose proton CT image registration for pretreatment alignment verification in reference to planning proton CT.
Cassetta R; Piersimoni P; Riboldi M; Giacometti V; Bashkirov V; Baroni G; Ordonez C; Coutrakon G; Schulte R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):83-90. PubMed ID: 30933433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the proton range accuracy and optimization of CT calibration curves utilizing range probing.
Meijers A; Free J; Wagenaar D; Deffet S; Knopf AC; Langendijk JA; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(3):03NT02. PubMed ID: 31896099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Registration of pencil beam proton radiography data with X-ray CT.
Deffet S; Macq B; Righetto R; Vander Stappen F; Farace P
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5393-5401. PubMed ID: 28771749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
