BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28658051)

  • 1. The relationship between cognitive style and event-related potentials during auditory and somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms.
    Imanaka M; Kakigi R; Nakata H
    Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):822-827. PubMed ID: 28658051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between cognitive style and sensory gating during auditory and somatosensory tasks.
    Mabuchi Y; Aoki Y; Shibasaki M; Nakata H
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Nov; 738():135354. PubMed ID: 32898617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Event-related potentials in adolescents with different cognitive styles: field dependence and field independence.
    Meng X; Mao W; Sun W; Zhang X; Han C; Lu C; Huang Z; Wang Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 216(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 22076405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of acute hypoxia on human cognitive processing: a study using ERPs and SEPs.
    Nakata H; Miyamoto T; Ogoh S; Kakigi R; Shibasaki M
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2017 Nov; 123(5):1246-1255. PubMed ID: 28729388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulus intensity and auditory white noise on human somatosensory cognitive processing: a study using event-related potentials.
    Mizukami H; Kakigi R; Nakata H
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 237(2):521-530. PubMed ID: 30474688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of white noise on event-related potentials in somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms.
    Ohbayashi W; Kakigi R; Nakata H
    Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(13):788-792. PubMed ID: 28570373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the interstimulus interval on somatosensory go/no-go event-related potentials.
    Nakata H; Sakamoto K; Kakigi R
    Neuroreport; 2010 Nov; 21(16):1040-4. PubMed ID: 20838262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of white noise duration on somatosensory event-related potentials.
    Ohbayashi W; Kakigi R; Nakata H
    Neuroreport; 2019 Jan; 30(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 30376478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between reaction time and response variability and somatosensory No-go potentials.
    Nakata H; Sakamoto K; Kakigi R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2012 Jan; 112(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 21519888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interaction between somatosensory and auditory cognitive processing assessed with event-related potentials.
    Touge T; Gonzalez D; Wu J; Deguchi K; Tsukaguchi M; Shimamura M; Ikeda K; Kuriyama S
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 25(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 18340272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Somatosensory amplification and its relationship to somatosensory, auditory, and visual evoked and event-related potentials (P300).
    Nakao M; Barsky AJ; Nishikitani M; Yano E; Murata K
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Mar; 415(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17267120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal dynamics of neural activity in motor execution and inhibition processing.
    Nakata H; Sakamoto K; Honda Y; Kakigi R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1448-58. PubMed ID: 25850961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of whole body skin cooling on human cognitive processing: a study using SEPs and ERPs.
    Nakata H; Kobayashi F; Lawley JS; Kakigi R; Shibasaki M
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2019 Sep; 317(3):R432-R441. PubMed ID: 31290686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of auditory, visual and olfactory event-related potentials for comparing interspersed- and single-stimulus paradigms.
    Nordin S; Andersson L; Olofsson JK; McCormack M; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Sep; 81(3):252-62. PubMed ID: 21756945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics of No-go-P300 component during somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms.
    Nakata H; Sakamoto K; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 478(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 20452400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field dependence-independence differently affects retrospective time estimation and flicker-induced time dilation.
    Teghil A; Boccia M; Guariglia C
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1019-1029. PubMed ID: 30729268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of task repetition on event-related potentials in somatosensory Go/No-go paradigm.
    Nakata H; Sakamoto K; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Lett; 2015 May; 594():82-6. PubMed ID: 25817359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. N100 and P300 amplitude to Go and No-Go variants of the auditory oddball in siblings discordant for schizophrenia.
    Sumich A; Kumari V; Dodd P; Ettinger U; Hughes C; Zachariah E; Sharma T
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Jan; 98(1-3):265-77. PubMed ID: 18022352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Field dependence-independence modulates the efficiency of filtering out irrelevant information in a visual working memory task.
    Jia S; Zhang Q; Li S
    Neuroscience; 2014 Oct; 278():136-43. PubMed ID: 25135352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children.
    Nakata H; Takezawa M; Kamijo K; Shibasaki M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259653. PubMed ID: 34748591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.