BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28658361)

  • 21. Variations between maxillary central and lateral incisal edges and smile attractiveness.
    Machado RM; Assad Duarte ME; Jardim da Motta AF; Mucha JN; Motta AT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Sep; 150(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 27585770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does the presence of unilateral gingival recession on maxillary canines influence smile esthetics?
    Figueiredo BA; Ribeiro JBP; Machado AW
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2020; 25(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32215478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons.
    Kumar S; Gandhi S; Valiathan A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):295. PubMed ID: 22945732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preferences for vertical position of the maxillary lateral incisors.
    King KL; Evans CA; Viana G; BeGole E; Obrez A
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 18575309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics.
    Nomura S; Freitas KMS; Silva PPCD; Valarelli FP; Cançado RH; Freitas MR; Oliveira RCG; Oliveira RCG
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):47-57. PubMed ID: 30427493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics.
    Pinho S; Ciriaco C; Faber J; Lenza MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 18068592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Esthetic Assessment of the Effect of Gingival Exposure in the Smile of Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Maxillary Incisor Agenesis.
    Pinho T; Bellot-Arcís C; Montiel-Company JM; Neves M
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jul; 24(5):366-72. PubMed ID: 25220205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of facial type on attractiveness of vertical canine position from the perspective of orthodontists and laypeople.
    Acar YB; Abuhan E; Boyacıyan R; Özdemir F
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Mar; 92(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 34652426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The perception of smile attractiveness to altered vertical position of maxillary anteriors by various groups.
    Babeer WA; Bakhsh ZT; Natto ZS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Mar; 101(9):e28660. PubMed ID: 35244035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Details of pleasing smiles.
    Oliveira PLE; Motta A; Pithon M; Mucha J
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2018; 13(4):494-514. PubMed ID: 30302439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople.
    Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 18575307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of maxillary incisors, lower lip, and gingival display relationship on smile attractiveness.
    Tosun H; Kaya B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Mar; 157(3):340-347. PubMed ID: 32115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Esthetic evaluation of frontal smile on different crown heights of lateral incisor and canine].
    Tu J; Yuan Y; Yan Z; Lei Y
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Mar; 43(3):301-305. PubMed ID: 29701193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective: a computer-based survey study.
    Ker AJ; Chan R; Fields HW; Beck M; Rosenstiel S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 139(10):1318-27. PubMed ID: 18832267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of variations in maxillary lateral incisor dimensions on smile esthetics.
    Haerian A; Rafiei E; Joshan N; Eghbali R; Tehrani PF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jan; 161(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 34417035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of the golden ratio in pleasing smiles.
    Nikgoo A; Alavi K; Alavi K; Mirfazaelian A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 19885425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics in cases with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors.
    Rosa M; Olimpo A; Fastuca R; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():34. PubMed ID: 24325825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Commentary: influence of the vertical position of maxillary central incisors on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Raj V
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Dec; 25(6):402-3. PubMed ID: 24180703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Smile attractiveness of patients treated for congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors as rated by dentists, laypersons, and the patients themselves.
    De-Marchi LM; Pini NI; Ramos AL; Pascotto RC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):540-6. PubMed ID: 24725615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered maxillary incisor crowding.
    Ma W; Preston B; Asai Y; Guan H; Guan G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 25439208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.