These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28658914)

  • 1. Photogrammetric Correlation of Face with Frontal Radiographs and Direct Measurements.
    Negi G; Ponnada S; Aravind NKS; Chitra P
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 May; 11(5):ZC79-ZC83. PubMed ID: 28658914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photogrammetric reliability of frontal facial photographs with radiographs and anthropometric measurements.
    Negi G; Chitra P
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2019; 9(3):280-285. PubMed ID: 31289717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of Photogrammetric Landmarks to the Conventional Cephalogram for Analyzing Soft-Tissue Landmarks in Orthodontics.
    Jaiswal P; Gandhi A; Gupta AR; Malik N; Singh SK; Ramesh K
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S171-S175. PubMed ID: 34447068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.
    Mehta P; Sagarkar RM; Mathew S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZC60-ZC64. PubMed ID: 28764295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlations between cephalometric and facial photographic measurements of craniofacial form.
    Zhang X; Hans MG; Graham G; Kirchner HL; Redline S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 17208108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photographic assessment of cephalometric measurements.
    de Carvalho Rosas Gomes L; Horta KO; Gandini LG; Gonçalves M; Gonçalves JR
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Nov; 83(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 23597034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative assessment of cephalometric with its analogous photographic variables.
    Gupta S; Tandon P; Singh GP; Shastri D
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2022; 13(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 35911811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between 3D dentofacial photogrammetry measurements and traditional cephalometric measurements.
    Castillo JC; Gianneschi G; Azer D; Manosudprasit A; Haghi A; Bansal N; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):275-283. PubMed ID: 30779676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Correlation between sagittal photogrammetric measurements of the soft tissue profile and dental arches measurements].
    Diouf JS; Touré B; Ndiaye M; Badiane A; Diop-Bâ K; Ngom PI; Diagne F
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Dec; 86(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26655417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry.
    Aksu M; Kaya D; Kocadereli I
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 20482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bolton's analysis using a photogrammetric method on occlusal photographs.
    Prakash A; Chitra P
    Eur Oral Res; 2020 May; 54(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 33474548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photography versus lateral cephalogram: role in facial diagnosis.
    Patel DP; Trivedi R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 24355960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part I: Methodology and reliability.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 7771369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Kale-Varlk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial photogrammetric profile measurements and sagittal dental occlusion in the young Congolese Bantu Adult (DRC).
    Esabish PL; Beugre-Kouassi LMA; Baukaka FS; Nzanza RM; Gboro TD; Beugre JB
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):342-353. PubMed ID: 31053446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of linear measurements on facial skeleton with frontal and lateral cephalogram.
    Gandikota CS; Rayapudi N; Challa PL; Juvvadi SR; Yudhister PV; Rao GH
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Apr; 3(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 22919218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of cephalometric measurements of monitor-displayed images by Nemoceph software and its hard copy by manual tracing.
    Tikku T; Khanna R; Maurya RP; Srivastava K; Bhushan R
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2014; 4(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 25737917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of facial asymmetry in Tirupati population: A posteroanterior cephalometric and photographic study.
    Reddy MR; Bogavilli SR; Raghavendra V; Polina VS; Basha SZ; Preetham R
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Dec; 6(Suppl 3):S205-S212. PubMed ID: 28217538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of anthropometry with photogrammetry based on a standardized clinical photographic technique using a cephalostat and chair.
    Han K; Kwon HJ; Choi TH; Kim JH; Son D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):96-107. PubMed ID: 19482483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.