These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28659255)
1. Mobile Device Accuracy for Step Counting Across Age Groups. Modave F; Guo Y; Bian J; Gurka MJ; Parish A; Smith MD; Lee AM; Buford TW JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Jun; 5(6):e88. PubMed ID: 28659255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Formative Evaluation of Consumer-Grade Activity Monitors Worn by Older Adults: Test-Retest Reliability and Criterion Validity of Step Counts. Maganja SA; Clarke DC; Lear SA; Mackey DC JMIR Form Res; 2020 Aug; 4(8):e16537. PubMed ID: 32651956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site. Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A catalog of validity indices for step counting wearable technologies during treadmill walking: the CADENCE-adults study. Mora-Gonzalez J; Gould ZR; Moore CC; Aguiar EJ; Ducharme SW; Schuna JM; Barreira TV; Staudenmayer J; McAvoy CR; Boikova M; Miller TA; Tudor-Locke C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Sep; 19(1):117. PubMed ID: 36076265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Video-Recorded Validation of Wearable Step Counters under Free-living Conditions. Toth LP; Park S; Springer CM; Feyerabend MD; Steeves JA; Bassett DR Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Jun; 50(6):1315-1322. PubMed ID: 29381649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults. Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry. Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validating the accuracy of an activity monitor in a visually impaired older population. Bajaj R; Ramulu P; Dillon L; Jakobsen KB; Tiedemann A; Rogers K; Keay L Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Sep; 38(5):562-569. PubMed ID: 29984414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the Validity of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Fitness Tracking Under Various Physical Activities: Comparative Study. Xie J; Wen D; Liang L; Jia Y; Gao L; Lei J JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e94. PubMed ID: 29650506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Smartwatch Step-Counting App for Older Adults: Development and Evaluation Study. Boateng G; Petersen CL; Kotz D; Fortuna KL; Masutani R; Batsis JA JMIR Aging; 2022 Aug; 5(3):e33845. PubMed ID: 35947445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy in Wrist-Worn, Sensor-Based Measurements of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in a Diverse Cohort. Shcherbina A; Mattsson CM; Waggott D; Salisbury H; Christle JW; Hastie T; Wheeler MT; Ashley EA J Pers Med; 2017 May; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 28538708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and Acceptability of Wrist-Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices: Systematic Review of the Literature. Germini F; Noronha N; Borg Debono V; Abraham Philip B; Pete D; Navarro T; Keepanasseril A; Parpia S; de Wit K; Iorio A J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e30791. PubMed ID: 35060915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults. Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216891. PubMed ID: 31112585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Fitbit Devices: Systematic Review and Narrative Syntheses of Quantitative Data. Feehan LM; Geldman J; Sayre EC; Park C; Ezzat AM; Yoo JY; Hamilton CB; Li LC JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Aug; 6(8):e10527. PubMed ID: 30093371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of step-count outcomes across seven different activity trackers: a free-living experiment with young and older adults. Nakagata T; Yamada Y; Taniguchi M; Nanri H; Kimura M; Miyachi M; Ono R BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2024 Jul; 16(1):156. PubMed ID: 39026366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using a consumer-based wearable activity tracker for physical activity goal setting and measuring steps in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: exploring acceptance and validity. Ehrlich SF; Maples JM; Barroso CS; Brown KC; Bassett DR; Zite NB; Fortner KB BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jun; 21(1):420. PubMed ID: 34103002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Criterion validity of ActiGraph monitoring devices for step counting and distance measurement in adults and older adults: a systematic review. Ngueleu AM; Barthod C; Best KL; Routhier F; Otis M; Batcho CS J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Oct; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 36253787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation. Mercer K; Giangregorio L; Schneider E; Chilana P; Li M; Grindrod K JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26818775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities. Alinia P; Cain C; Fallahzadeh R; Shahrokni A; Cook D; Ghasemzadeh H JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Aug; 5(8):e106. PubMed ID: 28801304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]