These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28659414)

  • 1. How do prosthetic stiffness, height and running speed affect the biomechanics of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations?
    Beck ON; Taboga P; Grabowski AM
    J R Soc Interface; 2017 Jun; 14(131):. PubMed ID: 28659414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prosthetic model, but not stiffness or height, affects the metabolic cost of running for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations.
    Beck ON; Taboga P; Grabowski AM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2017 Jul; 123(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 28360121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduced prosthetic stiffness lowers the metabolic cost of running for athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations.
    Beck ON; Taboga P; Grabowski AM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2017 Apr; 122(4):976-984. PubMed ID: 28104752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The biomechanics of the fastest sprinter with a unilateral transtibial amputation.
    Beck ON; Grabowski AM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 Mar; 124(3):641-645. PubMed ID: 29051334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosthetic shape, but not stiffness or height, affects the maximum speed of sprinters with bilateral transtibial amputations.
    Taboga P; Beck ON; Grabowski AM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229035. PubMed ID: 32078639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosthetic model, but not stiffness or height, affects maximum running velocity in athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations.
    Taboga P; Drees EK; Beck ON; Grabowski AM
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):1763. PubMed ID: 32019938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of prosthetic stiffness and added mass on metabolic power and asymmetry in female runners with a leg amputation.
    Ashcraft KR; Grabowski AM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2024 Jul; 137(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 38841756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulation of step frequency in transtibial amputee endurance athletes using a running-specific prosthesis.
    Oudenhoven LM; Boes JM; Hak L; Faber GS; Houdijk H
    J Biomech; 2017 Jan; 51():42-48. PubMed ID: 27923481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of Running-Specific Prostheses.
    Beck ON; Taboga P; Grabowski AM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168298. PubMed ID: 27973573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Running-specific prosthesis model, stiffness and height affect biomechanics and asymmetry of athletes with unilateral leg amputations across speeds.
    Tacca JR; Beck ON; Taboga P; Grabowski AM
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Jun; 9(6):211691. PubMed ID: 35706678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Running at submaximal speeds, the role of the intact and prosthetic limbs for trans-tibial amputees.
    Strike SC; Arcone D; Orendurff M
    Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():327-332. PubMed ID: 29614465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equivalent running leg lengths require prosthetic legs to be longer than biological legs during standing.
    Zhang-Lea JH; Tacca JR; Beck ON; Taboga P; Grabowski AM
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):7679. PubMed ID: 37169823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sprint kinematics of athletes with lower-limb amputations.
    Buckley JG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 May; 80(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 10326911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spring-mass behavioural adaptations to acute changes in prosthetic blade stiffness during submaximal running in unilateral transtibial prosthesis users.
    Barnett CT; De Asha AR; Skervin TK; Buckley JG; Foster RJ
    Gait Posture; 2022 Oct; 98():153-159. PubMed ID: 36126535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Athletes With Versus Without Leg Amputations: Different Biomechanics, Similar Running Economy.
    Beck ON; Grabowski AM
    Exerc Sport Sci Rev; 2019 Jan; 47(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 30334850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterisation of the responsive properties of two running-specific prosthetic models.
    Grobler L; Ferreira S; Vanwanseele B; Terblanche EE
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):141-148. PubMed ID: 27484759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shock absorption during transtibial amputee gait: Does longitudinal prosthetic stiffness play a role?
    Boutwell E; Stine R; Gard S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):178-185. PubMed ID: 27117010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of running speed and leg prostheses on mediolateral foot placement and its variability.
    Arellano CJ; McDermott WJ; Kram R; Grabowski AM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0115637. PubMed ID: 25590634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical adaptations of transtibial amputee sprinting in athletes using dedicated prostheses.
    Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2000 Jun; 15(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 10758296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic elastic response prostheses alter approach angles and ground reaction forces but not leg stiffness during a start-stop task.
    Haber CK; Ritchie LJ; Strike SC
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Apr; 58():337-346. PubMed ID: 29269103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.