These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28660253)

  • 1. Non-auditory neurocognitive skills contribute to speech recognition in adults with cochlear implants.
    Moberly AC; Houston DM; Castellanos I
    Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 1(6):154-162. PubMed ID: 28660253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".
    Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verbal working memory and inhibition-concentration in adults with cochlear implants.
    Moberly AC; Houston DM; Harris MS; Adunka OF; Castellanos I
    Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 2(5):254-261. PubMed ID: 29094068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Mattingly JK; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e956-e963. PubMed ID: 30444843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
    Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Neurocognitive Skills on Recognition of Spectrally Degraded Sentences.
    Lewis JH; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep; 32(8):528-536. PubMed ID: 34965599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
    Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-Variability Sentence Recognition in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users: Associations With Rapid Phonological Coding and Executive Functioning.
    Smith GNL; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1149-1161. PubMed ID: 30601227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
    Tamati TN; Ray C; Vasil KJ; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
    O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual working memory span in adults with cochlear implants: Some preliminary findings.
    Moberly AC; Pisoni DB; Harris MS
    World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 3(4):224-230. PubMed ID: 29780967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
    Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Vasil K; Wucinich T; Pisoni DB; Baxter J; Ray C; Shafiro V
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Apr; 128(4):959-966. PubMed ID: 28776711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relations Between Self-reported Executive Functioning and Speech Perception Skills in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Moberly AC; Patel TR; Castellanos I
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Feb; 39(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 29315194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of High-Variability Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Faulkner KF; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2023 Oct; 34(9-10):217-224. PubMed ID: 37748726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gated Word Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Adults With Cochlear Implants: Influence of Semantic Context.
    Patro C; Mendel LL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 29242894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Availability of binaural cues for pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    Sheffield SW; Haynes DS; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 25751696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.