141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28660327)
41. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.
Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M
Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Perioperative pain after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection.
Tolstrup R; Funder JA; Lundbech L; Thomassen N; Iversen LH
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Mar; 33(3):285-289. PubMed ID: 29242972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Security and Radical Assessment in Open, Laparoscopic, Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study.
Yang SX; Sun ZQ; Zhou QB; Xu JZ; Chang Y; Xia KK; Wang GX; Li Z; Song JM; Zhang ZY; Yuan WT; Liu JB
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818794160. PubMed ID: 30198395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Socioeconomic advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy].
Spalinger R; Largiadèr F
Praxis (Bern 1994); 1996 Mar; 85(13):406-10. PubMed ID: 8657973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in patients with chronic kidney disease: A propensity score-matched comparative analysis of surgical outcomes.
Takagi T; Kondo T; Tachibana H; Iizuka J; Omae K; Kobayashi H; Yoshida K; Tanabe K
Int J Urol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):505-510. PubMed ID: 28503809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Pose optimization and port placement for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery in cholecystectomy.
Feng M; Jin X; Tong W; Guo X; Zhao J; Fu Y
Int J Med Robot; 2017 Dec; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28251840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Minimally Invasive Pediatric Cholecystectomy: A Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Single and Multiport Techniques.
Nolan H; Glenn J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Jun; 28(6):770-773. PubMed ID: 29432055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Adoption of robotics in a general surgery residency program: at what cost?
Mehaffey JH; Michaels AD; Mullen MG; Yount KW; Meneveau MO; Smith PW; Friel CM; Schirmer BD
J Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 213():269-273. PubMed ID: 28601325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study.
Sanabria JR; Clavien PA; Cywes R; Strasberg SM
Can J Surg; 1993 Aug; 36(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 8103704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comparison of robotic single-incision and traditional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Gustafson M; Lescouflair T; Kimball R; Daoud I
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2276-80. PubMed ID: 26675933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary results at our Center].
Benincà G; Garrone C; Rebecchi F; Giaccone C; Morino M
Chir Ital; 2003; 55(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 12872566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single laparoscopic surgeon versus a multisurgeon robot-assisted cohort for partial nephrectomy.
Ellison JS; Montgomery JS; Wolf JS; Hafez KS; Miller DC; Weizer AZ
J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 22578725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci Surgical System in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Heemskerk J; van Dam R; van Gemert WG; Beets GL; Greve JW; Jacobs MJ; Bouvy ND
Dig Surg; 2005; 22(6):426-31. PubMed ID: 16479111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Single-port access cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparison of single-port access versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy].
Cziupka K; Partecke LI; Nass C; Mirow L
Zentralbl Chir; 2013 Feb; 138(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 22426970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A new era in laparoscopic surgery. Evaluation of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures.
Khairy GA; Fouda M; Abdulkarim A; Al-Saigh A; Al-Kattan K
Saudi Med J; 2005 May; 26(5):777-80. PubMed ID: 15951869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery in Singapore: single-institution experience with 20 consecutive patients.
Goh BK; Lee SY; Chan CY; Wong JS; Cheow PC; Chung AY; Ooi LL
Singapore Med J; 2018 Mar; 59(3):133-138. PubMed ID: 28983577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Costs and quality of life of small-incision open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - an expertise-based randomised controlled trial.
Rosenmüller MH; Nilsson E; Lindberg F; Åberg SO; Haapamäki MM
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28388942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
