These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28660378)
1. Mineral metabolism abnormalities in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic case controlled study. Minisola F; Cipriani C; Colangelo L; Cilli M; Sciarra A; Von Heland M; Nieddu L; Anastasi E; Pascone R; Fassino V; Diacinti D; Longo F; Minisola S; Pepe J Endocrine; 2018 Feb; 59(2):338-343. PubMed ID: 28660378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediagnostic prostate-specific antigen velocity and probability of detecting high-grade prostate cancer. Krejcarek SC; Chen MH; Renshaw AA; Loffredo M; Sussman B; D'Amico AV Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 17382156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of pretreatment factors, biopsy Gleason grade volume indices and post-treatment nadir PSA on overall survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with step-up hormonal therapy. Miyamoto S; Ito K; Miyakubo M; Suzuki R; Yamamoto T; Suzuki K; Suzuki K; Yamanaka H Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2012 Mar; 15(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 21986985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simple Risk Stratification to Detect Prostate Cancer with High Gleason Score in Repeat Biopsies in a Population Screening Follow-up Study. Kitagawa Y; Urata S; Mizokami A; Nakashima K; Koshida K; Nakashima T; Miyazaki K; Namiki M Anticancer Res; 2015 Sep; 35(9):5031-6. PubMed ID: 26254404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serum insulin level, disease stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score in prostate cancer. Lehrer S; Diamond EJ; Stagger S; Stone NN; Stock RG Br J Cancer; 2002 Sep; 87(7):726-8. PubMed ID: 12232754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database. Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fatty acid synthase in prostate cancer recurrence: SUV of [(11) C]acetate PET as a prognostic marker. Leisser A; Pruscha K; Ubl P; Wadsak W; Mayerhöfer M; Mitterhauser M; Hacker M; Kramer G; Shariat S; Karanikas G; Hartenbach M; Haug AR Prostate; 2015 Nov; 75(15):1760-7. PubMed ID: 26282590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High serum dihydrotestosterone examined by ultrasensitive LC-MS/MS as a predictor of benign prostatic hyperplasia or Gleason score 6 cancer in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 3-10 ng/mL. Miyoshi Y; Uemura H; Suzuki K; Shibata Y; Honma S; Harada M; Kubota Y Andrology; 2017 Mar; 5(2):262-267. PubMed ID: 27813361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy versus intermediate-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy, with or without zoledronic acid, in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (TROG 03.04 RADAR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 factorial trial. Denham JW; Joseph D; Lamb DS; Spry NA; Duchesne G; Matthews J; Atkinson C; Tai KH; Christie D; Kenny L; Turner S; Gogna NK; Diamond T; Delahunt B; Oldmeadow C; Attia J; Steigler A Lancet Oncol; 2014 Sep; 15(10):1076-89. PubMed ID: 25130995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association between the dihydrotestosterone level in the prostate and prostate cancer aggressiveness using the Gleason score. Nishiyama T; Ikarashi T; Hashimoto Y; Suzuki K; Takahashi K J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1387-91. PubMed ID: 16952639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume. Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advancing age within established Gleason score categories and the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Russo AL; Chen MH; Aizer AA; Hattangadi JA; D'Amico AV BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(7):973-9. PubMed ID: 22954029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PSA failure following definitive treatment of prostate cancer having biopsy Gleason score 7 with tertiary grade 5. Patel AA; Chen MH; Renshaw AA; D'Amico AV JAMA; 2007 Oct; 298(13):1533-8. PubMed ID: 17911498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The need for more aggressive therapy for men with Gleason 9-10 disease compared to Gleason ≤8 high-risk prostate cancer. Safdieh JJ; Schwartz D; Weiner JP; Nwokedi E; Schreiber D Tumori; 2016; 102(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 26917408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer. Nowak J; Malzahn U; Baur AD; Reichelt U; Franiel T; Hamm B; Durmus T Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 25505225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. Partin AW; Kattan MW; Subong EN; Walsh PC; Wojno KJ; Oesterling JE; Scardino PT; Pearson JD JAMA; 1997 May; 277(18):1445-51. PubMed ID: 9145716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era. Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]