These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Coherent natural scene structure facilitates the extraction of task-relevant object information in visual cortex. Kaiser D; Häberle G; Cichy RM Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118365. PubMed ID: 34233220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does object view influence the scene consistency effect? Sastyin G; Niimi R; Yokosawa K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):856-66. PubMed ID: 25522833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TMS to the lateral occipital cortex disrupts object processing but facilitates scene processing. Mullin CR; Steeves JK J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):4174-84. PubMed ID: 21812554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Võ ML; Henderson JM J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ERP evidence for the influence of scene context on the recognition of ambiguous and unambiguous objects. Dyck M; Brodeur MB Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jun; 72():43-51. PubMed ID: 25911127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hysteresis in the dynamic perception of scenes and objects. Poltoratski S; Tong F J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Oct; 143(5):1875-92. PubMed ID: 25150947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory scene context facilitates visual recognition of objects in consistent visual scenes. Niimi R; Saiki T; Yokosawa K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 36977906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Processing context: Asymmetric interference of visual form and texture in object and scene interactions. Lowe MX; Ferber S; Cant JS Vision Res; 2015 Dec; 117():34-40. PubMed ID: 26499389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to the transverse occipital sulcus affects scene but not object processing. Ganaden RE; Mullin CR; Steeves JK J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 25(6):961-8. PubMed ID: 23410031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions. Fenske MJ; Aminoff E; Gronau N; Bar M Prog Brain Res; 2006; 155():3-21. PubMed ID: 17027376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple synergistic effects of emotion and memory on proactive processes leading to scene recognition. Schettino A; Loeys T; Pourtois G Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():81-95. PubMed ID: 23664944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Object recognition in congruent and incongruent natural scenes: a life-span study. Rémy F; Saint-Aubert L; Bacon-Macé N; Vayssière N; Barbeau E; Fabre-Thorpe M Vision Res; 2013 Oct; 91():36-44. PubMed ID: 23891714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Templates for rejection can specify semantic properties of nontargets in natural scenes. Daffron JL; Davis G J Vis; 2015; 15(15):16. PubMed ID: 26605845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment. Mack SC; Eckstein MP J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 21856869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do target detection and target localization always go together? Extracting information from briefly presented displays. Carrigan AJ; Wardle SG; Rich AN Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2685-2699. PubMed ID: 31218599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]